Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 3;94(2):384–392. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0587

Table 4.

Risk factors for recovery from anemia (N = 17,358 recovered from anemia)

Characteristics Hgb > 11/person-months Univariate HR (95% CI) P value Multivariate* HR (95% CI) P value
Gender
 Female 12,702/142,436 Ref Ref
 Male 4,656/33,826 2.98 (2.88, 3.09) < 0.0001 1.72 (1.65, 1.78) < 0.0001
Age group, years
 < 30 3,263/35,375 Ref < 0.0001 Ref 0.55
 30 to < 40 7,720/80,103 0.99 (0.95, 1.03) 0.95 (0.91, 0.99)
 40 to < 50 4,421/42,385 1.12 (1.07, 1.17) 0.96 (0.92, 1.01)
 50+ 1,749/16,224 1.28 (1.21, 1.36) 0.94 (0.89, 1.00)
Marital status
 Married/cohabiting 7,058/70,752 Ref 0.93
 Widowed/divorced/separated 1,277/13,539 0.84 (0.79, 0.89)
 Single 4,940/49,299 1.01 (0.97, 1.05)
District
 Ilala 5,329/55,364 Ref < 0.0001 Ref < 0.0001
 Kinondoni 7,574/82,900 0.85 (0.82, 0.88) 0.91 (0.88, 0.95)
 Temeke 4,415/37,894 1.20 (1.15, 1.25) 1.18 (1.13, 1.22)
BMI group, kg/m2§
 < 18.5 3,464/25,044 1.05 (1.04, 1.13) < 0.0001 0.98 (0.94, 1.02) 0.008
 18.5 to < 25 10,118/101,422 Ref Ref
 25.0 to < 30 2,785/35,286 0.98 (0.94, 1.02) 1.10 (1.05, 1.14)
 30+ 991/14,510 0.95 (0.89, 1.02) 1.16 (1.08, 1.24)
WHO HIV disease stage§
 I 1,415/17,758 Ref < 0.0001 Ref 0.0001
 II 3,010/34,317 1.06 (1.00, 1.13) 1.00 (0.94, 1.07)
 III 10,243/100,169 1.37 (1.29, 1.44) 1.11 (1.04, 1.17)
 IV 2,689/24,006 1.79 (1.67, 1.91) 1.37 (1.28, 1.47)
CD4 count, cells/μL§
 < 50 2,884/18,971 2.34 (2.23, 2.45) < 0.0001 1.98 (1.89, 2.08) < 0.0001
 50 to < 200 6,598/52,843 1.77 (1.71, 1.83) 1.57 (1.52, 1.63)
 200+ 7,876/104,449 Ref Ref
Previous ART use 1,868/20,278 0.93 (0.88, 0.97) 0.003 1.04 (0.99, 1.10) 0.09
TB history 4,559/40,101 1.31 (1.26, 1.35) < 0.0001 1.10 (1.07, 1.15) < 0.0001
Oral candidiasis§ 614/6,590 2.16 (1.99, 2.34) < 0.0001 2.09 (1.92, 2.27) < 0.0001
Diarrhea§ 612/6,261 1.57 (1.45, 1.70) < 0.0001 1.40 (1.29, 1.52) < 0.0001
ALT > 120 U/L§ 186/1,927 1.30 (1.12, 1.50) 0.0004 1.22 (1.06, 1.41) 0.007
Hepatitis B surface antigen§ 1,005/9,805 1.05 (0.99, 1.12) 0.11 1.02 (0.96, 1.09) 0.49
Creatinine > 1.2 mmol/L§ 3,012/29,559 1.10 (1.06, 1.14) < 0.0001 1.08 (1.04, 1.12) 0.0003
Kaposi's sarcoma§ 15/49 1.32 (0.80, 2.20) 0.28
On septrin prophylaxis§ 2,283/16,241 1.31 (1.25, 1.37) < 0.0001 1.13 (1.08, 1.18) < 0.0001
Currently being treated for TB§ 2,033/14,693 1.41 (1.34, 1.48) < 0.0001 1.37 (1.30, 1.45) < 0.0001
Taking a multivitamin§ 5,924/62,914 0.86 (0.83, 0.88) < 0.0001 0.85 (0.83, 0.88) < 0.0001
On ART 12,004/123,353 1.76 (1.70, 1.83) < 0.0001 1.36 (1.32, 1.41) < 0.0001
Regimen contains AZT§ 4,843/52,700 0.88 (0.85, 0.92) < 0.0001 0.85 (0.82, 0.88) < 0.0001
Not on ART 5,354/52,909 0.54 (0.52, 0.56) 0.62 (0.60, 0.65)
Other regimens (non-AZT) 7,161/70,653 Ref Ref
Regimen contains EFV§ 5,507/51,035 0.99 (0.95, 1.02) < 0.0001 0.87 (0.84, 0.91) < 0.0001
Not on ART 5,354/52,909 0.56 (0.54, 0.59) 0.63 (0.60, 0.65)
Other regimens (non-EFV) 6,497/72,318 Ref Ref
ART regimen§
 D4T, 3TC, NVP 5,132/53,531 Ref < 0.0001 Ref < 0.0001
 D4T, 3TC, EFV 1,624/12,051 1.19 (1.12, 1.26) 1.02 (0.96, 1.08)
 AZT, 3TC, NVP 1,282/17,456 0.87 (0.82, 0.92) 0.87 (0.82, 0.93)
 AZT, 3TC, EFV 3,561/35,244 0.91 (0.87, 0.95) 0.81 (0.77, 0.84)
 TDF, FTC, EFV 322/3,740 0.70 (0.63, 0.79) 0.63 (0.56, 0.70)
 Other 83/1,331 0.83 (0.67, 1.03) 0.72 (0.58, 0.89)
 Not on ART 5,354/52,909 0.55 (0.52, 0.57) 0.61 (0.58, 0.63)

ALT = alanine aminotransferase; ART = antiretroviral treatment; AZT = zidovudine; BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; D4T = stavudine; EFV = efavirenz; TDF = tenofovir; FTC = emtricitabine; Hgb = hemoglobin; HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; NVP = nevirapine; TB = tuberculosis; 3TC = lamivudine; WHO = World Health Organization.

*

Multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio from a proportional hazards model was adjusted for all variables in the univariate analysis with P <0.20.

ARTs were entered into the final model separately with all other significant variables, AZT regimen, EFV regimen, ART, and ART regimens.

Referent group for “ART regimen” is comparing each regimen to “D4T, 3TC, NVP.”

§

Time-varying covariates. Analysis performed using Andersen–Gill data structure with 345,428 observations during follow-up period.

Association was significantly nonlinear. P value corresponds for the test of overall significance.

P value corresponds to test for trend.