Table 4.
Shock (N = 18) | Control (N = 72) | P value† | |
---|---|---|---|
Anti-EgCF antibody, n (%) | |||
+ | 4 (22.22) | 11 (13.75) | 0.003* |
++ | 11 (61.11) | 16 (20.00) | |
+++ | 3 (16.67) | 53 (66.25) | |
Anti-EgP antibody, n (%) | |||
+ | 4 (22.22) | 8 (10.00) | 0.907 |
++ | 12 (66.67) | 72 (90.00) | |
+++ | 2 (11.11) | 0 (0.00) | |
Anti-EgB antibody, n (%) | |||
− | 1 (5.56) | 1 (1.25) | 0.003* |
+ | 2 (11.11) | 9 (11.25) | |
++ | 12 (66.67) | 15 (18.75) | |
+++ | 3 (16.67) | 55 (68.75) | |
Anti-Em2 antibody, n (%) | |||
– | 3 (16.67) | 5 (6.25) | 0.147 |
+ | 15 (83.33) | 75 (93.75) |
anti-EgCF = crude hydatid cyst fluid antigen; anti-EgB = hydatid cyst fluid native antigen B; anti-Em2 = Echinococcus multilocularis metacestode antigen.
Indicates a significant difference between those with and without anaphylactic shock.
The data were analyzed using the Fisher's exact test or the χ2 test.