Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Diabetologia. 2015 Aug 2;58(11):2476–2485. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3717-2

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

(a) Forest plot of the adjusted HRs for incident diabetes by CRAE. Heterogeneity: τ2=0.01; χ2=10.28, df=4 (p=0.04); I2=61%. Test for overall effect: Z=0.96 (p=0.34). Forest plot shows multivariable adjusted HRs (model 3) of diabetes per 20 μm decrease in CRAE. (b) Forest plot of the adjusted hazard ratios for incident diabetes by CRVE. Heterogeneity: τ2=0.00; χ2=5.76, df=4 (p=0.22); I2=31%. Test for overall effect: Z=2.63 (p=0.009). Forest plot shows multivariable adjusted HRs (model 3) of diabetes per 20 μm increase in CRVE. (a, b) The summary estimates presented were calculated using a random effects model. Squares indicate the individual HR in each study. The size of each square is proportional to the percentage weight of that individual study in the meta-analysis and the horizontal line indicates 95% CI. Pooled HR and 95% CI are indicated by a black diamond