Table 2.
Associations between plasma phospholipid PUFAs in relation to incident mobility disability risk
Men n = 264 |
Women n = 292 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 (OR (95% CI)) | Model 2 (OR (95% CI)) | Model 3 (OR (95% CI)) | Model 1 (OR (95% CI)) | Model 2 (OR (95% CI)) | Model 3 (OR (95% CI)) | |
Long chain n - 3 PUFAs | 0.94 (0.49; 1.78) | 1.07 (0.54; 2.14) | 1.24 (0.57; 2.70) | 0.47 (0.25; 0.89) | 0.49 (0.26; 0.93) | 0.48 (0.25; 0.93) |
Eicosapentaenoic acid | 0.83 (0.42; 1.64) | 0.96 (0.45; 2.01) | 1.05 (0.47; 2.32) | 0.53 (0.28; 1.03) | 0.55 (0.28; 1.07) | 0.55 (0.28; 1.10) |
Docosapentaenoic acid | 0.79 (0.43; 1.45) | 0.82 (0.41; 1.60) | 0.85 (0.43; 1.70) | 1.02 (0.67; 1.56) | 1.07 (0.70; 1.66) | 1.12 (0.71; 1.74) |
Docosahexaenoic acid | 1.11 (0.60; 2.08) | 1.22 (0.65; 2.29) | 1.46 (0.70; 3.04) | 0.45 (0.25; 0.81) | 0.46 (0.26; 0.84) | 0.45 (0.24; 0.83) |
Alpha-linoleic acid | 1.16 (0.69; 1.93) | 1.12 (0.65; 1.93) | 1.11 (0.64; 1.94) | 1.36 (0.94; 1.97) | 1.42 (0.96; 2.09) | 1.40 (0.95; 2.07) |
Long chain n - 6 PUFAs | 0.92 (0.52; 1.65) | 0.79 (0.42; 1.48) | 0.72 (0.37; 1.41) | 1.35 (0.83; 2.19) | 1.32 (0.81; 2.16) | 1.29 (0.78; 2.15) |
Linoleic acid | 1.11 (0.60; 2.06) | 0.93 (0.46; 1.86) | 0.90 (0.44; 1.83) | 1.32 (0.83; 2.12) | 1.29 (0.80; 2.07) | 1.27 (0.78; 2.05) |
Arachidonic acid | 0.69 (0.34; 1.39) | 0.69 (0.34; 1.39) | 0.60 (0.28; 1.31) | 1.05 (0.67; 1.64) | 1.05 (0.65; 1.70) | 1.03 (0.63; 1.67) |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids. Mobility disability was defined as having much difficulty or unable to walk 500 m and/or climb 10 steps at follow-up. Seventeen men and twenty-five women reported having mobility disability. Model 1 was adjusted for age, education, waist circumference and follow-up time. Model 2 was adjusted for model 1 plus smoking status, physical activity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and heart disease. Model 3 was adjusted for model 2 plus serum vitamin D.