Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 12.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2014 Aug 15;120(0 16):2597–2603. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28825

Table 3. Overall and Outcome-Specific Concordance for Demographic Variables: 1996 to 2004.

Demographic Variable No. Concordance (95% CI)
Race/ethnicity 5603 90.7 (86.4-93.8)
 Non-Hispanic white 2444 98.4 (97.0-99.1)
 Non-Hispanic black 999 94.5 (90.0-97.0)
 Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander 75 82.4 (37.6-97.3)
 Non-Hispanic Alaskan Native/American Indian 175 85.3 (69.7-93.6)
 Hispanic 1538 97.0 (93.3-98.7)
 Other/multiraciala 58 66.1 (32.4-88.8)
 Undocumentedb 314 c
Date of birth: Same date 5602 97.9 (96.9-98.5)

Abrbeviations: CI, confidence interval.

a

Protocol inconsistencies between the validation abstraction and the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) in the capture of “other” race, multiple races, and missing race or ethnicity data resulted in conservative other/multiracial concordance estimates.

b

The validation project abstracted data strictly from program medical records, of which 5.6% were missing race and ethnicity reports. NBCCEDP accessed administrative records to capture race or ethnicity data for the Minimum Data Elements (MDEs). In total, 288 abstracted records were missing race and ethnicity but were reported in the MDEs. Notably, among the undocumented abstracted records, all of the discordance corresponds to single non-Hispanic race or Hispanic ethnicity reports in the MDEs.

c

The undocumented outcome-specific concordance estimates are not meaningful because of the inconsistent protocols between the validation project and the MDEs with respect to missing race and ethnicity reports. In addition, these suppressed estimates are unstable with relative standard errors that exceed 30%.