Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 12.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Addict Behav. 2015 Sep 28;30(1):39–51. doi: 10.1037/adb0000120

Table 2.

Models predicting drinking outcomes from perceptions of same-gender veterans

Drinks per week AUDIT Heavy episodic drinking
Predictor Adjusted
IRR
(95% CI)
Wald
χ2
Adjusted
IRR
(95% CI)
Wald
χ2
Adjusted
IRR
(95% CI)
Wald χ2
Age 1.00
(0.98 – 1.02)
0.42 0.99
(0.97 – 1.01)
1.12 0.99
(0.96 – 1.01)
1.09
Male gender 1.03
(0.84 – 1.26)
0.07 1.14
(0.93 – 1.40)
1.50 0.99
(0.76 – 1.28)
0.01
African-American race 0.65
(0.51 – 0.83)
12.60 1.12
(0.89 – 1.41)
0.86 0.79
(0.57 – 1.09)
2.00
Other race/ethnicity 0.66
(0.51 – 0.86)
9.59 0.72
(0.56 – 0.94)
5.92 0.53
(0.38 – 0.75)
12.77
Hispanic/Latino race/ethnicity 0.90
(0.68 – 1.19)
0.56 1.13
(0.85 – 1.50)
0.70 0.65
(0.46 – 0.93)
5.58
Air Force 0.97
(0.77 – 1.23)
0.05 1.00
(0.80 – 1.26)
0.00 1.00
(0.74 – 1.34)
0.00
Marine Corps 1.03
(0.85 – 1.24)
0.09 1.04
(0.86 – 1.25)
0.15 1.01
(0.80 – 1.28)
0.01
Navy 1.35
(1.10 – 1.66)
8.54 1.16
(0.95 – 1.42)
2.13 1.09
(0.85 – 1.40)
0.46
Combat severity 1.07
(1.05 – 1.10)
31.48 1.06
(1.03 – 1.08)
21.94 1.07
(1.04 – 1.10)
18.33
Perceived drinks per week for same-gender veterans 1.02
(1.02 – 1.03)
99.90 1.0
(1.01 – 1.02)
43.77 1.03
(1.02 – 1.04)
91.48
Perceived attitudinal norm (mean composite) for same-gender veterans 0.98
(0.91 – 1.06)
0.25 1.05
(0.97 – 1.13)
1.50 0.88
(0.79 – 0.97)
6.27

Note: Effects significant at p < .05 (χ2 > 3.84 for one df tests) are bolded. Adjusted Incident risk ratio (IRR) gives the proportional change in each outcome as a function of one unit change in the predictor controlling for the other predictors in the model. 95% Confidence intervals are presented in parentheses. The IRR’s are assessed relative to the following reference groups: female, Caucasian non-Hispanic, and Army, which each have an IRR = 1 by definition.