Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jan 19;82:142–148. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.021

Table 2.

Results from the regression analysis.

TAS-DIF (“Difficulty Identifying Feelings”)
T-AI* 0.02 t=1.86, p=0.03 4.04
T-ACC 0.01 t=1.64, p=0.05 1.00
T-Volume Loss 0.005 T=0.14, p=0.44 0.39
Overall Model**: R2=0.09; F3,125=4.25, p=0.007, f2=0.10; BF10=3.67
TAS-DDF (“Difficulty Describing Feelings”)
T-AI 0.02 t=1.78, p=0.04 1.79
T-ACC 0.004 t=0.50, p=0.31 0.31
T-Volume Loss −0.01 t=−0.31, p=0.38 0.33
Overall Model: R2=0.04; F3,125=1.86, p=0.14, f2=0.04; BF10=0.19
TAS-EXO (“Externally-Oriented Thinking”)
T-AI 0.02 t=1.70, p=0.04 0.94
T-ACC 0.009 t=1.11, p=0.13 0.50
T-Volume Loss −0.03 t=−0.84, p=0.20 0.30
Overall Model: R2=0.04; F3,125=1.76, p=0.16, f2=0.04; BF10=0.17
TAS-total
T-AI** 0.02 t=2.38, p=0.009 8.82
T-ACC 0.01 t=1.50, p=0.07 0.71
T-Volume Loss −0.01 t=−0.44, p=0.33 0.31
Overall Model**: R2=0.10; F3,125=4.39, p=0.006, f2=0.10; BF10=4.32
*

: Regressor is significant at the p<0.05 (one-tailed) and BF10>3 level.

**

: Regressor is significant at the p<0.01 level.