Table 4.
Study | Cases (n) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Accuracy (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ludwin et al. [38] | 117 | 94 | 83 | 99 | 65 | 85 |
Ludwin et al. [37] | 83 | 96 | 89 | 99 | 73 | 89 |
De Felice et al. [14] | 104 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Guimaraes Filho et al. [30] | 55 | 100 | 94 | 73 | 100 | 92 |
Valenzano et al. [58] | 54 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Ragni et al. [50] | 98 | 91 | 100 | 100 | 99 | 98 |
Alborzi et al. [3] | 186 | 91 | 100 | 100 | 96 | 97 |
Dodero et al. [17] | 52 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Brown et al. [7] | 46 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Soares et al. [55] | 65 | 73 | 100 | 100 | 97 | 93 |
Alatas et al. [2] | 62 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Goldberg et al. [23] | 32 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Keltz et al. [34] | 18 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Mean (95 % CI) | 95.8 (91.1–100) | 97.4 (94.1–100) | 97.8 (93.3–100) | 94.6 (87.6–100) | 96.5 (93.4–99.5) |
HyCoSy hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, CI confidence interval