Table 5.

Diagnostic accuracy of 3D US compared with hysteroscopy ± laparoscopy in diagnosing female genital tract congenital anomalies

Study	Cases (n)	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	PPV (%)	NPV (%)	Accuracy (%)
Imboden et al. [31]	10	100	100	100	100	100
Laganà et al. [35]	224	100	100	100	100	100
Ludwin et al. [38]	117	97	100	100	80	94
Moini et al. [42]	214	87	97	99	54	84
Bocca et al. [6]a	125	100	100	100	100	100
Faivre et al. [18]	31	100	100	100	100	100
Ghi et al. [22]	284	100	100	100	100	100
Makris et al. [39]	248	100	100	100	100	100
Momtaz et al. [44]	38	97	96	92	99	96
Radoncic and Funduk-Kurjak [49]	267	100	100	100	100	100
Wu et al. [61]	40	100	100	100	100	100
Mean (95 % CI)		98.3 (95.6–100)	99.4 (98.4–100)	99.2 (97.6–100)	93.9 (84.2–100)	97.6 (94.3–100)

3D US three-dimensional ultrasound, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, CI confidence interval

^aPerformed in conjunction with saline infusion