Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 18;42(2):358–368. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv133

Table 4.

A Priori Selected FA, Adjusted for Gender, IQ, BMI, Tobacco Use

Adjusted
B SE b 95% CI P
DHA (C22:6w3)
Intercept 12.30 2.50 7.38 17.22 <.001
Status (overall) .087
 Controls/patients −1.45 0.72 −2.87 −0.025 .046
 Siblings/patients −0.026 0.58 −1.17 1.12 .965
 Siblings/controlsa 1.42 0.70 0.05 2.79 .042
DPA (C22:5w3)
Intercept 8.40 1.00 6.44 10.36 <.001
Status (overall) .002
 Controls/patients −0.95 0.29 −1.51 −0.38 .001
 Siblings/patients −0.02 0.23 −0.47 0.43 .930
 Siblings/controlsa 0.93 0.28 0.38 1.47 .001
AA (C20:4w6)
Intercept
76.79 5.100 66.77 86.80 <.001
Status (overall) <.001
 Controls/patients −3.46 1.48 −6.37 −0.56 .019
 Siblings/patients 2.18 1.17 −0.13 4.48 .064
 Siblings/controlsa 5.64 1.42 2.85 8.44 <.001
LA (C18:2w6)
Intercept 74.39 5.71 63.16 85.62 <.001
Status (overall) .098
 Controls/patients −2.62 1.64 −5.85 0.61 .112
 Siblings/patients 0.76 1.37 −1.93 3.45 .579
 Siblings/controlsa 3.38 1.58 0.28 6.48 .033
NA (C24:1w9)
Intercept 15.49 1.80 11.95 19.03 <.001
Status (overall) <.001
 Controls/patients −1.78 0.53 −2.83 −a0.74 .001
 Siblings/patients 0.63 0.39 −0.14 1.41 .108
 Siblings/controlsa 2.42 0.51 1.41 3.43 <.001
EPA (C20:5w3)b
Intercept 0.39 0.95 −0.92 2.69 .682
Status (overall) .243
 Controls/patients −0.31 0.18 −0.73 −0.32 .058
 Siblings/patients −0.04 0.19 −0.52 0.23 .888
 Siblings/controlsa 0.28 0.18 −0.92 0.59 .079

aBecause the regression coefficients of the dummy variables based on the dummy variable coding of the regression analyses only resulted in estimates for the differences between controls and patients and siblings and patients, we re-analyzed the data with an alternative dummy variable coding that also enabled us to estimate the adjusted differences between siblings and controls: coding: controls/ patients: 1/0; coding: siblings/patients: 1/0; coding: siblings/controls: 1/0.

bBootstrap results based on 2000 bootstrap samples.