Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 1;19(2):134–142. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0232

Table 3.

Effects of Patient Spiritual Well-Being and Comorbidity on Dyad Congruence, Patient Decisional Conflict, Surrogate Decision-Making Confidence, and Composite Outcomea

  Dyad congruenceb Patient DCS Surrogate DMC Composite outcomeb
  OR (95% CI) Regression coefficient (95% CI) Regression coefficient (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
  Whites African Americans Whites African Americans Whites African Americans Whites African Americans
FACIT-meaning 1.02 (0.92–1.13) 0.91* (0.82–1.00) 0.004 (−0.02–0.03) 0.01 (−0.01–0.03) - - 1.02 (0.92–1.13) 0.88* (0.80–0.97)
FACIT-peace 1.05 (0.95–1.15) 0.95 (0.87–1.03) −0.02 (−0.03–0.002) 0.003 (−0.01–0.02) - - 1.04 (0.95–1.14) 0.92 (0.85–1.01)
FACIT-faith 0.99 (0.88–1.12) 0.93 (0.84–1.04) −0.01 (−0.03–0.01) −0.01 (−0.03–0.01) - - 1.04 (0.95–1.14) 0.93 (0.84–1.04)
CCI 0.95 (0.78–1.16) 1.21* (1.04–1.42) −0.01 (−0.05–0.02) 0.001 (−0.03–0.04) −0.01 (−0.04–0.02) 0.04* (0.01–0.08) 0.97 (0.79–1.18) 1.27** (1.08–1.48)
*

p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

a

Each generalized estimating equation (GEE) model included intervention, time, the interaction between intervention and time, the baseline, and the covariate.

b

Reference for dyad congruence = dyads not congruent in both scenarios; reference for composite outcome = dyads not congruent and/or surrogate DMC score <3.

CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; CI, confidence interval; DCS, Decisional Conflict Scale; DMC, Decision-Making Confidence; FACIT, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (completed by patients only); OR, odds ratio.