Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2015 Oct 28;125:903–919. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.068

Table 3.

A. ROC Measures (Initial Sample) Poor vs (Good + Excellent) Good vs Excellent
MAXVOX AUC (+− 95% CI) 0.892 (0.866–0.919) 0.881 (0.862–0.901)##
Sensitivity/Specificity 0.848/0.830 0.782/0.827
Youden Index 0.678 0.609
Cutoff 7041 2282
Classification Accuracy 84.60% 79.92%
MEANVOX AUC (+− 95% CI) 0.922 (0.899–0.944) 0.839 (0.816–0.862)
Sensitivity/Specificity 0.852/0.844 0.790/0.733
Youden Index 0.696 0.523
Cutoff 866.9 426.1
Classification Accuracy 85.11% 76.78%
MOTION AUC (+− 95% CI) 0.899 (0.871–0.927) 0.787 (0.761–0.814)
Sensitivity/Specificity 0.881/0.769 0.720/0.748
Youden Index 0.65 0.468
Cutoff 0.824 0.411
Classification Accuracy 86.66% 73.22%
TSNR AUC (+− 95% CI) 0.93 (0.908–0.952)** 0.711 (0.68–0.741)
Sensitivity/Specificity 0.873/0.857 0.706/0.611
Youden Index 0.73 0.317
Cutoff 6.47 7.16
Classification Accuracy 87.03% 66.86%
B. Classification Accuracy of QA Measures
Poor Good Excellent
Initial Sample Stage 1 126 (86%) 1055 (87%)
Stage 2 - 385 (82%) 581 (78%)
Follow-up Sample Stage 1 10 (83%) 348 (96%)
Stage 2 - 31 (52%) 283 (94%)
**

Significantly higher AUC than MAXVOX and MOTION

##

Significantly higher AUC than TSNR, MEANVOX, and MOTION