Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 13;67(4):1161–1178. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw039

Table 5.

QTLs for root growth angle (RGA) identified across Colosseo×Lloyd and Meridiano×Claudio RIL populations, the association panel (Unibo-DP), and projected wheat QTLs

SRA QTL Chr. CIa QTL-tag SNP Co×Ldb SNPc Mr×Cld SNPe Association panelf SNPg Wheat QTLsh
(cM) (ID) (effect, R 2, isignif.i)i (allele) (effect, R 2, signif.) (allele) (effect, R 2, signif.) (allele) (reference)
QRga.ubo-1B 1B 61–62–68 IWA7700 NS

C/T NS

T/T +7.2 (4.2) ** C/T
QRga.ubo-2A.1 2A 7–10–12 IWB16988 NS

––
T/T NS

––
T/T +7.7 (4.7) ** C/T
QRga.ubo-2A.2 2A 97–99–102 IWA1597 NS T/T NS T/T +10.8 (3.9) ** C/T (Ta6)
QRga.ubo-2A.3 2A 208–211–213 IWB20424 NS A/A NS A/A +9.5 (7.5) *** A/G (Ta3)
QRga.ubo-2B.1 2B 37–43–45 IWB4604 –10.0 (11.7) *** T/C NS T/C NS C/T
QRga.ubo-2B.2 2B 70–72–75 IWB73449 NS A/A NS G/G +8.2 (6.2) ** A/G
QRga.ubo-2B.3 2B 68–77–87 IWB39220 +6.0 (6.2) ** A/A NS G/G NS A/G
QRga.ubo-2B.4 2B 100–114–130 IWB62718 +5.0 (4.4) ** G/A NS A/A NS A/G (Ta6)
QRga.ubo-2B.5 2B 175–176–183 IWB13830 = IWB7663 NS A/G +5.8 (6.7) *** A/G +4.70 (2.4) * A/G
QRga.ubo-3A 3A 171–173–176 IWB70610 NS A/A NS A/A –6.9 (5.5) ** A/G
QRga.ubo-3B 3B 181–188–196 wPt-5947 NS 1/0 –4.6 (4.2) ** 1/0 NS
QRga.ubo-4A 4A 154–156–159 wPt-0538 NS 1/1 NS 1/1 –12.5 (4.2) ** 1/0
QRga.ubo-4B.1 4B 33–35–38 IWB73831 NS T/C NS T/C –6.7 (4.6) ** C/T
QRga.ubo-4B.2 4B 44–47–49 IWB69501 NS T/C NS C/C –8.6 (3.8) ** C/T
QRga.ubo-4B.3 4B 66–75–91 IWB60481 +4.2 (2.4) ** C/T NS C/C NS C/T
QRga.ubo-4B.4 4B 82–82–86 IWB12276 NS A/A –8.2 (13.8) *** A/G NS A/G
QRga.ubo-5B.1 5B 2–3–13 IWB75279 NS 1/1 –5.6 (6.1) *** 0/1 NS 1/0
QRga.ubo-5B.2 5B 47–49–52 IWB24957 NS C/C NS C/C +15.0 (4.6) ** C/T
QRga.ubo-6A.1 6A 70–72–75 IWB50963 NS A/G NS A/G –11.9 (5.2) ** A/G
QRga.ubo-6A.2 6A 119–122–123 IWB71119 +10.0 (17.8) *** G/A NS G/A –10.6 (8.8) *** A/G
QRga.ubo-6A.3 6A 127–130–136 IWB24237 NS T/T –5.8 (7.0) ** T/C NS C/T
QRga.ubo-6B.1 6B 20–22–25 IWB62692 NS A/A NS A/A +6.8 (4.8) ** A/G (Ta3)
QRga.ubo-6B.2 6B 143–145–147 IWB13062 NS G/G NS G/G –7.0 (4.5) ** A/G (Ta3)
QRga.ubo-7A.1 7A 4–10–21 wPt-9207 +6.0 (5.5) *** 0/1 NS 1/1 NS 1/0 (Ta4)
QRga.ubo-7A.2 7A 128–130–133 IWA2752 NS C/C NS C/C +11.8 (7.1) *** C/T
QRga.ubo-7A.3 7A 125–131–135 IWB35428 NS T/T +5.6 (6.5) ** C/– NS C/T
QRga.ubo-7A.4 7A 145–147–150 IWB56095 NS C/T NS –/C –7.2 (5.3) ** C/T
QRga.ubo-7A.5 7A 177–180–183 IWB3169 NS C/C NS T/C +10.4 (7.2) *** C/T
QRga.ubo-7B 7B 175–177–180 IWB371 NS G/G NS G/G +12.8 (5.1) ** A/G

a Refers to the tetraploid wheat consensus map (Maccaferri et al., 2015).

b Allelic effect reported as double-dose substitution of the Colosseo versus Lloyd allele. A positive sign indicates that the Colosseo allele increases the trait, and vice versa.

c SNP alleles in the RIL population: Colosseo allele (first)/Lloyd allele (second).

d SNP allelic effect (a) reported as double-dose substitution (2a) of the Meridiano versus Claudio allele. A positive sign indicates that the Meridiano allele increases the trait and vice versa; NS, non-significant.

e SNP alleles in the mapping population: Meridiano allele (first)/Claudio allele (second).

f SNP allelic effect (a) reported as double-dose (2a) substitution of the A or C allele (reported first) versus the G or T allele (reported second).

g SNP alleles in Unibo-DP. The allele with the highest frequency is reported as bold italic font.

h Literature references are listed in Supplementary Fig. S2.

i RGA is expressed as degress while R 2 is expressed as a percentage; QTL effect significance; RIL populations, **LOD 2–3; ***LOD>3; GWAS in Unibo-DP, **marker-wise P≤0.01; ***marker-wise P≤0.001; ****experiment-wise P≤0.05 (=marker-wise P≤0.0001).