Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cortex. 2015 Nov 6;75:1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.10.020

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Cortical damage in the left ATL associated with naming deficits when accounting for recognition deficits. Shown are FDR-thresholded results (p values) from the voxelwise logistic regression analyses of naming deficits when accounting for recognition deficits in the same category. Significant results are observed for three out of the five categories (Faces, Animals, and Musical Instruments). These results are shown in the upper three rows, thresholded using FDR (q ≤ .05). There is a trend for Fruits & Vegetables (bottom row, thresholded using FDR q<0.10), but no significant result for Tools. Only Faces are associated with cortical damage to the entire temporal pole (that includes the anterior and superior aspects). By contrast, the three other categories are associated with damage to the posterior ventrolateral ATL. Compared to the baseline analysis (Figure 4), the extent of cortical damage in the ATL associated with Fruits & Vegetables is reduced (restricted primarily to the posterior ventrolateral ATL).