Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):1178–1196. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0637-5

Table 3.

Correlations (r) of SVET 1.0 and experience self-reports within and between categories for a single group of subjects on MTurk (N=116) in Study 1.

SVET and Experience (within category) SVET and Experience for other categories Experience and SVET for other categories
Car 0.37^* 0.06 0.13
Plane 0.36^* 0.15 0.06
Transformer 0.50^* 0.06 0.09
Dinosaur 0.40^* 0.21 0.19
Shoe 0.44^* −0.09 0.24
Bird 0.33^* 0.14 0.04
Leaf 0.27^* 0.01 −0.15
Mushroom 0.27^* 0.08 −0.03

Column 1 shows the correlation between SVET and experience for the same category. Column 2 shows the correlation between SVET for the category and experience-Other (average of self-reports on other 7 categories). Column 3 shows the correlation between experience for the category and SVET-Other (average of SVET performance on other 7 categories). Values in bold are statistically significant (rCrit(114)=.18, p<.05). The contrast of interest tests if within category relations are stronger than across category relations. In Column 1, this is denoted with a ^ if Column 1 (within) is greater than Column 2 (across category experience) and with a * if Column 1 (within) is greater than Column 3 (across category SVET) as tested using a one-tail Steiger’s Z (p<0.05).