Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):1178–1196. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0637-5

Table 5.

Accuracy on CFMT, VETs and SVETs in Study 2.

Mean 95% CI Median IQR Skewness
CFMT 0.80 (.78, .82) 0.81 0.17 −0.42
VET Car 0.59 (.57, .61) 0.60 0.21 0.06
Plane 0.68 (.66, .70) 0.69 0.21 −0.01
Transformer 0.72 (.70, .74) 0.73 0.19 −0.19
Dinosaur 0.70 (.69, .71) 0.69 0.17 −0.28
Shoe 0.73 (.71, .75) 0.75 0.17 −0.42
Bird 0.67 (.65, .69) 0.69 0.19 −0.41
Leaf 0.57 (.55, .59) 0.58 0.15 −0.27
Mushroom 0.60 (.59, .61) 0.60 0.13 −0.22
SVET Car 0.62 (.60, .64) 0.60 0.19 0.21
Plane 0.45 (.44, .46) 0.44 0.13 0.32
Transformer 0.42 (.41, .43) 0.42 0.13 0.54
Dinosaur 0.47 (.46, .48) 0.46 0.08 0.80
Shoe 0.54 (.52, .56) 0.50 0.23 0.43
Bird 0.47 (.46, .48) 0.46 0.10 0.48
Leaf 0.53 (.51, .55) 0.52 0.17 0.24
Mushroom 0.40 (.39, .41) 0.40 0.13 0.30

Columns show the mean sum score, 95% confidence interval (CI), median, interquartile range (IQR), and skewness.