Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb;7(1):29–44. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.105

Table 1. Variables in the application of HIPEC as a treatment for peritoneal metastases.

Patient-related variables
   5 different diseases (colorectal, appendiceal, gastric, and ovarian cancer, malignant peritoneal mesothelioma)
   Many unusual indications for CRS and HIPEC
   Prevention protocols
   Treatment protocols
   Extreme treatment protocols
Methodologic variables
   HIPEC vs. EPIC, HIPEC + EPIC, EPIC only
   No hyperthermia (<41 °C) vs. moderate hyperthermia (≥41-43 °C) vs. extreme hyperthermia (>43-45 °C)
   Carrier solution volume—3 L vs. 1.5 L/m2 vs. 6 L
   Carrier solution type—saline vs. 1.5% dextrose peritoneal dialysis solution vs. 5% dextrose in water vs. lactated Ringer’s solution vs. dextran solutions
   Intraperitoneal irrigations—saline vs. distilled water vs. 0.75% peroxide vs. Betadine
   Volume of intraperitoneal irrigation—extensive intraperitoneal lavage (10 L one liter at a time) vs. other
   Open vs. closed vs. Coliseum vs. Landager vs. closed then open
   Timing—30 vs. 60 vs. 90 vs. 180 minutes
   Intraperitoneal epinephrine vs. no epinephrine
   Chemotherapy solutions vs. aerosols
Pharmacologic variables
   Route of administration—intraperitoneal only vs. intraperitoneal and intravenous
   Naked drugs vs. nanoparticles
   Single vs. multiple drugs
   Mitomycin C
   Oxaliplatin
   Irinotecan
   Cisplatin
   Doxorubicin
   5-fluorouracil
   Melphalan
   Gemcitabine
   Carboplatin
   Docetaxel
   Paclitaxel
   Pemetrexed
   Mitoxantrone

CRS, cytoreductive surgery; HIPEC, hyperthermic perioperative chemotherapy; EPIC, early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy.