Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb;7(1):122–128. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.099

Table 3. Learning curve in cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC assessed by consecutive and risk-adjusted cohorts.

Author No. of cases for operative IP No. of cases for oncologic IP Statistical technique Initial/pre inflection-point cohort
Experienced/post inflection-point cohort
n Mean PCI CC 0/1 (%) Severe morbidity (%) Mortality (%) n Mean PCI CC 0/1 (%) Severe morbidity (%) Mortality (%)
Consecutive cohorts
    Yan et al. (25) Longitudinal cohort study 70 87 30.0 7.1 70 90 10 1.4
    Moran et al. a (13) Longitudinal cohort study 33 66.6 27 18 34 55.9 0 3
    Smeenk et al. (24) 130 Longitudinal cohort study 194 9.5 59.8 6.7 129 7 34.1 3.9
Risk-adjusted cohorts
    Polanco et al. b (27) 180 90 RA-SPRT 200 14.2 83.5 25.5 170 12.2 86 35.2
    Andreasson et al. c (26) 73 (220 procedures) PLS & CUSUM 73 26 47 1.4 55 26 58 1.8
    Kusamura et al. (11) 140 RA-SPRT 150 18.1 82 26 270 18.8 93.6 29.6

a, initial and experienced cohorts are first 33 and last 34 cases of a consecutive 100 case series; b, reported simplified PCI score. Instances of mortality were not included in the learning curve analysis; c, median PCI score reported. Morbidity not classified into severe. Cases consisted of pseudomyxoma peritonei and experienced cohort had less cases of higher grade disease. HIPEC, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion; IP, inflection point; PCI, peritoneal cancer index; CC, completion of cytoreduction scoring system; RA-SPRT, risk adjusted sequential probability ratio test; PLS, partial least square; CUSUM, cumulative sum control chart.