Table 4.
Drinking risk.
Risk level | Intervention | Control | ||||
|
Baselinea (n=49) n (%) |
Follow-upa (n=49) n (%) |
P | Baselinea (n=47) n (%) |
Follow-upa (n=47) n (%) |
P |
Harmfulc | 13 (26.5) | 16 (32.7) | .63 | 18 (38.3) | 21 (44.7) | .74b |
Hazardousd | 9 (18.4) | 6 (12.2) |
|
13 (27.7) | 10 (21.3) |
|
Non-hazardouse | 27 (55.1) | 27 (55.1) |
|
16 (34.0) | 16 (34.0) |
|
a No differences in risk category at baseline (P=.12) or follow-up (P=.11).
b P-values for the paired data analyses (Bowker’s test of symmetry) between baseline and follow-up are .73 for the intervention and .72 for the control group.
c Problems are likely
d At-risk for problems
e No known risks