Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2016 Feb 16;6:21177. doi: 10.1038/srep21177

Nanoarchitectured Nb2O5 hollow, Nb2O5@carbon and NbO2@carbon Core-Shell Microspheres for Ultrahigh-Rate Intercalation Pseudocapacitors

Lingping Kong 1, Chuanfang Zhang 1, Jitong Wang 1, Wenming Qiao 1,2, Licheng Ling 1,2, Donghui Long 1,2,a
PMCID: PMC4754730  PMID: 26880276

Abstract

Li-ion intercalation materials with extremely high rate capability will blur the distinction between batteries and supercapacitors. We construct a series of nanoarchitectured intercalation materials including orthorhombic (o-) Nb2O5 hollow microspheres, o-Nb2O5@carbon core-shell microspheres and tetragonal (t-) NbO2@carbon core-shell microspheres, through a one-pot hydrothermal method with different post-treatments. These nanoarchitectured materials consist of small nanocrystals with highly exposed active surface, and all of them demonstrate good Li+ intercalation pseudocapacitive properties. In particular, o-Nb2O5 hollow microspheres can deliver the specific capacitance of 488.3 F g−1, and good rate performance of 126.7 F g−1 at 50 A g−1. The o-Nb2O5@carbon core-shell microspheres show enhanced specific capacitance of 502.2 F g−1 and much improved rate performance (213.4 F g−1 at 50 A g−1). Furthermore, we demonstrate for the first time, t-NbO2 exhibits much higher rate capability than o-Nb2O5. For discharging time as fast as 5.9 s (50 A g−1), it still exhibits a very high specific capacitance of 245.8 F g−1, which is 65.2% retention of the initial capacitance (377.0 F g−1 at 1 A g−1). The unprecedented rate capability is an intrinsic feature of t-NbO2, which may be due to the conductive lithiated compounds.

Interests in the development of electrochemical supercapacitors for high power applications have greatly intensified in recent years1,2. There are many electrode materials that are under close scrutiny, such as porous carbon materials, transition metal oxides and electronically conducting polymers3,4,5. The capacitance in the case of porous carbon materials is mainly due to the electric double layer formation at the electrode-electrolyte interface, while for the transition metal oxides and the conducting polymers, it is due to fast faradaic reaction6,7,8,9,10. Generally, three types of faradaic reaction have been recognized as pseudocapacitive processes. They are reversible surface adsorption (for example, adsorption of hydrogen on the surface of platinum)11, redox reactions of transition metal oxides (e.g., RuO2, MnO2, NiCo2O4)12,13,14 and electrochemical doping-dedoping in conductive polymers (e.g., polyaniline, polypyrrole)15,16. The first two processes are primarily surface or near-surface reversible redox reactions, while the third process is more of a bulk process17.

Recently, it was firstly recognized by Bruce Dunn et al. that capacitive-type lithium ions insertion/extraction reaction could occur not at the surface but in the bulk orthorhombic Nb2O5 in non-aqueous Li+ electrolyte18. The intercalation pseudo-capacitive behavior was highly dependent upon the presence of a crystalline structure. Amorphous and pseudo-hexagonal Nb2O5 exhibited lower specific capacitance values than o-Nb2O519. This was due to the unique orthorhombic phase structure, which could provide fast two dimensional transport paths for Li+ between atomic layers. Thus, the kinetics was not diffusion-limited so that the overall electrochemical behavior was capacitive. This material represents capacities typical of battery materials but at rates closer to those of supercapacitors, which may open the door to a new energy storage concept that materials can possess battery and capacitor properties simultaneously. So far, only a few crystalline host materials have been identified to exhibit intercalation pseudocapacitive behavior, such as cation-intercalation type titanium carbide20 and oxygen-intercalation type LaMnO3 perovskite21 in aqueous electrolyte, and Li+-intercalation type Nb2O5 in organic electrolyte8. It would be of great importance to explore new analogous materials with a crystalline network for high-rate energy storage.

Similar to most pseudocapacitive metal oxides, Nb2O5 is an electronic semi-conductor with a bulk electrical conductivity of ~3.4 × 10−6 S cm−1 at 300 K22,23. When Nb2O5 nanocrystals are fabricated into a relatively thick practical electrode, the electrochemical utilization and high-rate property would be limited due to an increase of the ohmic polarization and ion diffusion constraints. It is known that as the dimensions of metal oxide crystals are reduced, their pseudocapacitive responses increase markedly, due to a high density of active surface and short pathways24,25,26. In addition, nanostructured composites with high conductivity and more exposed electroactive sites could further promote the pseudocapacitive properties. For example, Wang et al. prepared the CNT-Nb2O5 composites via a physical mixing, which could enable fast electron transport, and thus improve the rate capability27. Zhang et al. reported that the hydrothermal growth of Nb2O5 nanoparticles on carbide-derived carbons and consequent CO2 heat treatment could result in an increased gravimetric capacitance (157 C g−1) at a charge-discharge time of 3 min28. Our recently work also demonstrated that the synergistic effects between graphene and Nb2O5 nanoparticles, including minimizing the particle size, preventing particles from agglomerating, and facilitating electron and proton conduction, could give the composites very high capacitance and excellent rate capability29. All these results suggest that nanostructured technology is a superior strategy to boost the electrochemical capacitive performance of the intercalation electrode. Thus, developing synthetic procedure that yields optimized nanostructure composites would intrigue considerable interest.

In this work, we successfully constructed a series of nanoarchitectured materials including o-Nb2O5 hollow microspheres, o-Nb2O5@carbon core-shell microspheres and t-NbO2@carbon core-shell microspheres, through a one-pot hydrothermal method with different post-treatments. This synthetic procedure was straightforward and inexpensive, and consequently can be readily adopted to produce larger quantities of nanostructured microspheres. All these nanoarchitectured materials consisted of small nanocrystals with highly exposed active surface and shorter ion transport path. It was confirmed that the hollow o-Nb2O5 microspheres should be favored for intercalation electrodes, as they could provide hollow centers, which increases the surface-to-bulk ratio thus increasing the contact area between the active material and electrolyte. Compared with o-Nb2O5 hollow microspheres, o-Nb2O5@carbon core-shell microspheres showed enhanced specific capacitance and improved rate performance. These results confirmed that as two functional materials were constructed in a programmed way, possible synergetic efforts and better electrochemical properties could be achieved. More importantly, we found for the first time, that t-NbO2 nanocrystals exhibited much better charge storage kinetics than the o-Nb2O5. It exhibited considerable specific capacitance at ultrahigh rates, with nearly 245.8 F g−1 being stored reversibly within 5.9 s (a current density 50 A g−1). This value is higher than what has been reported for the Nb2O5 and other metal oxides30,31,32. The ultrafast Li+ intercalation kinetics of t-NbO2 may open up exciting possibilities of producing improved intercalation electrodes for high-power supercapacitors.

Results

Material synthesis and characterization

The synthesis and conversion strategy of o-Nb2O5 hollow microspheres, o-Nb2O5@carbon and t-NbO2@carbon core-shell microspheres is schematically illustrated in Fig. 1. Amorphous Nb2O5@polymer core-shell microspheres (Figure S1) are firstly prepared via a one-pot hydrothermal process, using resorcinol (R) and formaldehyde (F) as polymeric core precursor and ammonium niobate oxalate hydrate as Nb2O5 precursor. The formation of Nb2O5@polymer core-shell microspheres is accomplished by the “couple synthesis” approach, which should involve the fast formation of RF polymeric microspheres in situ, followed by the hetero-nucleation and growth of Nb2O5 nanoparticles on the RF polymeric microsphere surfaces. This process could be well verified by a hydrothermal time-dependent experiment (Figure S2).

Figure 1. Schematics of the fabrication process: amorphous Nb2O5@polymer core-shell microspheres were obtained through hydrothermal method, followed with different post-treatments: (Step I) calcination in air flow at 600 oC; (Step II) heat-treatment in N2 flow at 800 oC; (Step III) a mild oxidation of t-NbO2@carbon microspheres in air flow at 300 oC.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The obtained Nb2O5@polymer core-shell microspheres could be converted into three kinds of nanoarchitectured materials through heat-treatment in air or N2 atmosphere. As illustrated in Fig. 1, o-Nb2O5 hollow microspheres are obtained by direct calcination of Nb2O5@polymer core-shell microspheres in air flow at 600 oC (Step I). The o-Nb2O5 crystalline structure could be confirmed by XRD, Raman results and XPS analysis (Fig. 2). The hollow microspheres exhibit a high degree of crystallinity with an orthorhombic unit cell (JCPDS No. 30-0873) with diffraction peaks at 22.6o (001), 28.3o (180), 28.9o (200), 36.5o (181), 37.0o (201), 42.5o (2100), 45.0o (330) for typical o-Nb2O5 crystals19,33. The specific Raman vibrational modes centered at 120 cm−1 (v1, the vibrations of octahedrons as a whole), 230 cm−1 and 310 cm−1 (v2 and v3, the vibrations of cations located inside the octahedrons and tetrahedrons, and 690 cm−1 (v4, the stretching Nb–О bonds), also confirm the o-Nb2O5 phase34,35. The high-resolution Nb3d XPS spectrum has peaks for Nb3d5/2 at 206.9 eV and Nb3d3/2 at 209.6 eV, in good agreement with the binding energies of Nb2O536.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) XRD patterns, (b) Raman spectra and (c) high-resolution Nb3d XPS spectrum of o-Nb2O5 hollow microspheres, t-NbO2@carbon core-shell microspheres and o-Nb2O5@carbon core-shell microspheres.

Direct carbonization of Nb2O5@polymer core-shell microspheres in N2 flow results the formation of t-NbO2@carbon core-shell microspheres (Step II). The tetragonal phase of NbO2 can be well revealed by its XRD pattern, which is indexed to JCPDS No. 43-1043 with diffraction peaks at 2θ of 26.0o (400), 35.2o (222), 37.1o (440), 39.9o (402), 52.1o (262), 53.5o (800), 60.4o (840), 65.6o (662), 68.3o (404) and 78.0o (2102)37. The XRD pattern of t-NbO2@carbon also shows two small peaks at 22.6o and 28.3o corresponding to (001) and (180) planes of o-Nb2O5, respectively. The peaks in Raman spectrum are around 164 cm−1 (v1), 337 cm−1 (v2) and 402 cm−1 (v3), which are in consistent with the fingerprints of t-NbO238,39. In addition, three peaks in Nb3d XPS spectrum are solved at 205.7 eV (Nb3d5/2, Nb + 4), 207.5 eV (Nb3d5/2, Nb+5) and 210.2 eV (Nb3d3/2, Nb+5), in good agreement with the binding energies of t-NbO240,41. The presence of Nb+4 species agrees with XRD and Raman indication, which suggests that amorphous Nb2O5 are mainly reduced to t-NbO2 instead of o-Nb2O5. This is possibly due to a reduction effect by carbon in N2 atmosphere during heat treatment process.

A mild oxidation of t-NbO2@carbon core-shell microspheres at 300 oC in air flow could transfer t-NbO2 phase into o-Nb2O5 phase (Step III). The obtained o-Nb2O5@carbon core-shell microspheres show similar XRD structure with o-Nb2O5 hollow microspheres. From Raman spectrum, there is only a strong peak appeared at around 680 cm−1 (Nb-O-Nb bridging bond of distorted NbO6) that corresponds to a fingerprint of o-Nb2O5 phase42. XPS result indicates that the successful transition of t-NbO2 phase to o-Nb2O5 phase, as Nb3d5/2 (Nb+4) peak disappeared. The other two peaks in o-Nb2O5@carbon core-shell microspheres show little shifts to higher binding energy in contrast to that of o-Nb2O5 hollow microspheres, and these shifts might be caused by the incomplete oxidation of t-NbO2. It should be noted that the oxidation do not apparently alter the structure of carbon cores, as the intensities of D-Raman peak to G-Raman peak (ID/IG) are almost the same before and after oxidation. The weight contents of NbO2 and Nb2O5 in microspheres are 33.3 wt% and 34.0 wt% respectively, as determined by TG in air flow (Figure S3).

The porosity of these samples is shown in Figure S4 and Table S1. The o-Nb2O5 hollow microspheres have a relatively BET surface area of 26 m2/g. After compositing with carbon core, the BET surface areas of t-NbO2@carbon and o-Nb2O5@carbon core-shell microspheres increase to 473 m2/g and 456 m2/g, respectively. The increased surface areas are apparently due to the contribution of microporous carbon cores.

The morphologies of the nanoarchitectured materials are observed by SEM and TEM. As shown in Fig. 3a–c, all the nanoarchitectured materials consist of spherical particles with a diameter of 2-3 μm. More SEM images are provided in Figure S5. Their surfaces show urchin-like shell assembled by numerous nanorods protruding radially from the center. These protruding nanorods offer relatively high contact area between active material and electrolyte, which should provide short and more efficient ion transport. The TEM images further reveal the detailed core-shell structure of these materials. In Fig. 3d, one can easily distinguish between the dark image in shell and the lighter region in core, indicating the hollow structure of o-Nb2O5 microspheres. The lattice fringes from o-Nb2O5 nanocrystals can be clearly observed in Fig. 3g. The distance between two adjacent lattice fringes has been found to be 0.39 nm which is within measurement error, consistent with (001) plane of orthorhombic Nb2O5. The TEM images show that t-NbO2@carbon and o-Nb2O5@carbon core-shell microspheres have quite similar morphological characteristics, with thick carbon core and thin urchin-like shell consisted of protruding nanorods. The difference in lattice could be observed in HR-TEM images, where t-NbO2 nanocrystals consist of (400) plane with spacing 0.34 nm while o-Nb2O5 nanocrystals includes (001) plane with spacing 0.39 nm.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

SEM, TEM and HR-TEM images of o-Nb2O5 hollow microspheres (a,d,g), t-NbO2@carbon core-shell microspheres (b,e,h) and o-Nb2O5@carbon core-shell microspheres (c,f,i).

Electrochemical characterization

Orthorhombic Nb2O5 crystals have been identified as a pseudocapacitive material that exhibited intrinsic intercalation pseudocapacitance and did not limit to thin film electrode8,18,19. However, for a thick electrode containing insulating PVDF binder, the high-rate performance of Nb2O5 should be deteriorated due to the poor electron conductivity and limited ionic transport throughout the internal volume of thicker electrode layer. To emphasize the importance of nanostructured materials on electrode performance, a practical electrode with a thickness of ca. 50 μm was used. In preliminary experiments, we studied the electrochemical performance of pure carbon microspheres (Figure S6). We found that the electric double-layer capacitance of carbon microsphere was negligible compare to the pseudo-capacitance of Nb2O5. For facile comparison, the gravimetric current and capacitance are calculated based on the weight of active materials (Nb2O5 or NbO2).

Cyclic voltammograms of o-Nb2O5 hollow microspheres and o-Nb2O5@carbon core-shell microspheres from 2 to 100 mV s−1 are compared in Fig. 4a,b. It is evident that both of them exhibit broad anodic and cathodic peak with small voltage separation in sweep rate range from 2 to 20 mV s−1. This characteristic is one of indicatives of pseudocapacitive behavior18. When the sweep rates are beyond 20 mV s−1, there is a noticeable peak shift due to the ohmic contribution. The specific capacitances are calculated by integrating the discharge portions of CV plots. As specific capacitance versus sweep rate plot presents in Fig. 4f, the specific capacitance and its retention of o-Nb2O5@carbon core-shell microspheres are significantly higher than these of o-Nb2O5 hollow microspheres at various sweep rates.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

CV curves of o-Nb2O5 hollow microspheres (a), o-Nb2O5@carbon core-shell microspheres (b) and t-NbO2@carbon core-shell microspheres (c,d). The b-value from plot of log(i) versus log(v) for cathodic current peak (e). Specific capacitance versus sweep rate (f).

The kinetic characterization is studied by plotting log(i) versus log(v) for cathodic current peak with varied sweep rates, which can be used to distinguish the charge storage whether arises diffusion-controlled or capacitive processes. This relation is expressed as i = avb with the value of b providing insights regarding the charge storage mechanism. Whereas a b-value of 0.5 indicates that the current is controlled by semi-infinite linear diffusion, and a value of 1 indicates that the current is capacitive process18,43. In sweep rate range of 1–20 mV s−1, the b-value of o-Nb2O5 hollow microspheres is very close to 1 but deviates severely at high rates (50–200 mV s−1), as shown in Fig. 4e. The hollow structures can provide a hollow center which increases the surface-to-bulk ratio. However, the limitation of active material resistance may deteriorate its rate capability at high rates. In contrast, o-Nb2O5@carbon core-shell microspheres has a b-value of 1 at a relatively wide range from 1 to 50 mV s−1, indicating the improved rate handling properties. The core-shell structure, in which conductive carbon microsphere is the core and o-Nb2O5 nanorods with short ion transport path is the shell, should be the reason why the electrochemical utilization and rate handling properties of o-Nb2O5 are improved.

There are three oxides of niobium: NbO, NbO2 and Nb2O5. While o-Nb2O5 has been reported as a pseudocapacitive material due to its unique crystalline structure, the charge storage in NbO2 has never been reported so far. As such, this work studies for the first time the charge storage in t-NbO2. The electrochemical properties of t-NbO2@carbon core-shell microspheres are firstly investigated by CV under the potential range of 1.0–3.0 V (vs. Li/Li+) with the sweep rate range from 1–1000 mV s−1. The t-NbO2 also exhibit a pair of well-defined cathodic and anodic peaks, which is similar to the electrochemical properties of o-Nb2O5. Kumagai et al. have revealed that the continuous variation in valence state from Nb5+ to Nb4+ takes place in Li+ intercalation reaction of Nb2O533:

graphic file with name srep21177-m1.jpg

Similarly, the Li+ intercalation reaction of NbO2 could be proposed as:

graphic file with name srep21177-m2.jpg

The redox couple of Nb4+/3+ should take place during Li+ intercalation reaction of NbO2. Thus, the reduction peaks at around 1.5 V result from Nb4+ to Nb3+, while the oxidation peaks at around 1.6 V is from Nb3+ to Nb4+. For clear comparison of Li+ intercalation potential of NbO2 and Nb2O5, the CV curves of o-Nb2O5 hollow, o-Nb2O5@carbon and t-NbO2@carbon at 1 mV s−1 are shown in Figure S7a. The Li+ insertion and extraction peaks of t-NbO2@carbon are at around 1.35 V and 1.42 V, respectively. While, o-Nb2O5 hollow sample shows two insertion peaks at 1.17 V and 1.41 V and one broad extraction peaks at 1.60 V. Apparently, t-NbO2 and o-Nb2O5 show the different Li+ intercalation potential, which could be also confirmed by the following electrochemical tests of commercial t-NbO2 and o-Nb2O5 powders in Figure S7b. The t-NbO2 and o-Nb2O5 provide different interstitial sites for Li+ result in different intercalation potential. While, the broad insertion/extraction peaks indicate that their intercalation sites exhibit the broad Li+ adsorption energy distribution.

The specific capacitance of t-NbO2@carbon is 235.1 F g−1 at a charging time of 200 s (10 mV s−1), lower than 242.7 F g−1 for o-Nb2O5 hollow and 300.1 F g−1 for o-Nb2O5@carbon. However, with charging time decreasing, the capacitance of t-NbO2 decreases slightly and over 47.9% of the capacity can be maintained within 2 s, much higher than these for o-Nb2O5. The kinetic information obtained from CV curves is shown in Fig. 4e. The b-value of t-NbO2 is close to 1 for cathodic peak currents in a wide sweep rate range of 1 to 500 mV s−1, further indicting that an ultrafast Li+ intercalation process with a capacitive behavior takes place in t-NbO2. The kinetic response suggests that t-NbO2 possesses much better charge storage kinetics than o-Nb2O5.

The electrochemical behaviors of NbO2 and Nb2O5 are further studied by galvanostatic charge-discharge test. A comparison for all samples at a current density of 1 A g−1 during the initial discharge curve is shown in Fig. 5a. In the potential range of 1.0–2.0 V, all the discharge potential vary linearly with time, showing a good capacitive behavior as expected for a pseudocapacitive process. The shallower slope observed for o-Nb2O5@carbon is consistent with its higher capacitance. The rate capabilities of all samples from 1 to 50 A g−1 are compared in Fig. 5b. At a low current density of 1 A g−1 (5 C), t-NbO2@carbon has a specific capacitance of 377.1 F g−1 corresponding to 0.59 moL Li+ inserted in t-NbO2 (Li0.59NbO2), lower than that of o-Nb2O5 hollow (488.2 F g−1, Li1.62Nb2O5) and o-Nb2O5@carbon (502.1 F g−1, Li1.66Nb2O5). However, the capacity retention of t-NbO2 is much higher than those of o-Nb2O5 at high current densities. It still retains 245.8 F g−1 at 50 A g−1 (250 C), comparing to 126.1 F g−1 and 213.4 F g−1 for o-Nb2O5 hollow and o-Nb2O5@carbon, respectively. Such a high rate performance has rarely been reported for other pseudocapacitive metal oxides.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Galvanostatic charge-discharge curves (a) and rate capability (b) of o-Nb2O5 hollow microspheres, t-NbO2@carbon core-shell microspheres and o-Nb2O5@carbon core-shell microspheres.

The ultrafast kinetics of Li+ intercalation in t-NbO2@carbon core-shell microspheres is particularly intriguing. However, it is not clear whether the observed behavior is unique to the nanostructure or the fundamental charge storage properties of t-NbO2 or the presence of impurity Nb2O5 in t-NbO2@carbon. To figure it out, commercial NbO2 and Nb2O5 powders (a high-purity of 99.9% for NbO2 and 99.99% for Nb2O5) were directly used as electrode materials. The typical SEM images are shown in Figure S8. The NbO2 powders consist of aggregated nanoparticles with average size of 20 μm, while Nb2O5 powders consist of scattered nanoparticles about 100 nm with slight aggregation, both of which are much larger than these prepared samples. The structure of commercial NbO2 and Nb2O5 powders has been compared by XRD, Raman and XPS results in Figure S9. The NbO2 and Nb2O5 exhibit the pure tetragonal and orthorhombic phase, respectively, which have the same crystal structure with our prepared samples.

The CV curves of commercial powders in sweep rate range from 5 to 500 mV s−1 are compared in Fig. 6a,b. These measurement conditions correspond to a charge or discharge time between 400 and 4 seconds. Moreover, comparing the electrochemical performance of the prepared nanoarchitectured Nb2O5 microspheres and commercial Nb2O5 powders in Figure S10, o-Nb2O5 hollow and o-Nb2O5@carbon exhibit the significantly higher specific capacitance and better rate capability than commercial o-Nb2O5 powders. This should be due to the improved electrochemical utilization of nanoarchitectured Nb2O5 hollow and o-Nb2O5@carbon with shorter Li+ diffusion path and more active sites.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

CV curves of commercial o-Nb2O5 powders (a) and t-NbO2 powders (b); the b-value of cathodic current peak (c); the capacity retention versus sweep rate (d); lithiated crystal structural schemes of o-Nb2O5 (e) and t-NbO2 (f).

The kinetics characterization is used to determine the charge storage behavior, whether it arises capacitive or diffusion-controlled processes. In Fig. 6c, the b-value of cathodic peak for commercial t-NbO2 is 1 in a wide sweep rate range (1 to 200 mV s−1), similar to what is observed with t-NbO2@carbon core-shell microspheres. The sweep-rate dependence of the capacity retention indicates that t-NbO2 electrode retains 54.3% of its maximum capacitance, much higher than 23.7% for o-Nb2O5 electrode at 500 mV s−1. These results verify that the ultrafast Li+ intercalation into t-NbO2 is an intrinsically capacitive process, and does not depend on the nanostructure of t-NbO2.

Discussion

The nature of intercalation pseudocapacitive behavior of o-Nb2O5 is still a matter of debate, as the Li+ should meet a substantial resistance to insert into the densely packed crystal structure. Simon et al. proposed that intercalation pseudocapacitance observed with Nb2O5 is an intrinsic feature, arising from fast Li+ transport within the crystal structure18. Ganesh et al. concluded that it was due to the unique open channels of NbOx sheets (similar to nano-porous structure) that reduce the energy barrier and facilitate the local charge transfer between lithium and oxygen structures44. In this work, we find that not only Nb2O5, but also NbO2 exhibits faster intercalation pseudocapacitive response. Apparently, these two materials have different structural and chemical similarities. As illustrated in Fig. 6e, the unit cell of o-Nb2O5 has sheets of edge- or corner-sharing distorted octahedral of [NbO6] and decahedron of [NbO7] lying parallel to (001) direction with 5% of the Nb5+ ions randomly located in 9-coordinate sites between (001) polyhedral planes. The rest of the empty octahedral sites provide natural tunnels for Li+ transport throughout the ab plane. While, the structure of t-NbO2 in Fig. 6f is only composed of corner- or edge-sharing octahedral of [NbO6]18,44,45. Both of t-NbO2 and o-Nb2O5 have such open channels of NbOx sheets, thus giving arise to the possibility of pseudocapacitive mechanism. But, over a long-range, t-NbO2 is more structurally ordered than o-Nb2O5, which consists of distorted [NbO6] octahedral and [NbO7] decahedron. Thus, this may be one possible reason for the better kinetics of the former material as the intercalation material.

On the other hand, Li+ insertion into the structure dramatically increases the electronic conductivity of Nb2O5. Orel et al. showed that the conductivity of chemically-lithiated Nb2O5 was four orders of magnitude higher than that of Nb2O546. Moreover, for the chemically delithiated LiNbO2, the LixNbO2 (x < 1) is highly conductive and even becomes a superconductor at a transition temperature (Tc) of ~5 K47,48. The stoichiometric compound LiNbO2 is a semi-conductive or semi-metallic behavior. However, the lithium-deficient LixNbO2 (x < 1) is a superconductor with the superstructure derived from the ordering of the lithium vacancies in consecutive layers of [LiO6] octahedral. In this work, the NbO2 is converted into the LixNbO2 (x ~ 0.59) during electrochemical Li+ intercalation process, which may undergo an insulator-to-metal transition (from NbO2 to LixNbO2).

Furthermore, the EIS results of before and after lithiation in t-NbO2@carbon and o-Nb2O5@carbon were shown in Figure S11. Simulations indicate that the faradaic charge transfer resistance (Rpseudo) decreases obviously on lithiation from 3.9 to 3.2 ohms for t-NbO2, and 5.4 to 3.9 ohms for o-Nb2O5, which means the lithiated compounds with the enhanced electronic conductivity. The phase angle of the slope line in low frequency increases slightly after lithiating to 1.0 V for NbO2 and Nb2O5, indicating a better Li+ diffusion in the lithiated compounds. Thus, we proposed that during electrochemically intercalation process, the NbO2 was changed into LixNbO2, which may also go through a semiconductor to conductive transition. The enhanced electronic conductivity is in favour of electrostatic adsorption of Li+ onto the surface of lithiated LixNbO2 nanocrystals and thus promoting the fast ion diffusion in the bulk. Although a detailed reaction mechanism has not been reached, we speculate that the high-rate intercalation behavior of this system results from not only a structure with two-dimensional transport pathways and little structural change on intercalation, but also the formation of conductive lithiated compounds with no limitations of the surface adsorption and surface transfer. However, whether as-obtained lithiated LixNbO2 exhibits high conductivity, it should need further resultant conductivity test to check this hypothesis.

In summary, we successfully construct a series of nanoarchitectured intercalation materials including o-Nb2O5 hollow microspheres, o-Nb2O5@carbon and t-NbO2@carbon core-shell microspheres for ultrahigh-rate Li+ intercalation pseudocapacitors. In these core-shell nanostructures, the conductive carbon core could mitigate the low electronic conductivity of nanocrytals. On the other hand, the 3D urchin-like shell structure assembled by numerous nanorods could increase the utilization degree of the nanocrystals and improve the electrode kinetics. Thus, o-Nb2O5@carbon core-shell microspheres show higher electrochemical utilization and faster rate handling properties compared with o-Nb2O5 hollow microspheres. And more importantly, we find for the first time, the t-NbO2 exhibits much better Li+ intercalation kinetics than the o-Nb2O5, even no diffusion limitations for charging times as fast as 5.9 s (250 C rate). The more ordered crystal structure of t-NbO2 and enhanced conductivity of LixNbO2 might be the reasons for faster kinetics of t-NbO2. We speculate that the origin of high-rate pseudocapacitance in Nb2O5 and NbO2 are more likely due to the lithiated compounds with dramatically conductivity instead of their crystal structure. A wide range of possibilities to modify the crystalline and physical properties of Nb-O derived structures would probably lead to materials with both high energy density and high power density, which will confuse the distinction between supercapacitors and batteries.

Methods

Synthesis

The o-Nb2O5 hollow microspheres, o-Nb2O5@carbon and t-NbO2@carbon core-shell microspheres were fabricated through a facile one-pot hydrothermal method followed with different post-treatments. In a typical process, 1.368 g of resorcinol (R) 2.016 g of formaldehyde (F, 37%) and 1.824g of ammonium niobate oxalate hydrate (C4H4NNbO9•xH2O, 99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich) were mixed in 70 mL DI-water at room temperature. After stirring for 4 h at 40 oC, the solution was transferred to a 90 mL Teflon-lined autoclave and heated at 180 oC for 24 h. The resulting precipitates were collected, filtered, washed with DI-water several times, then dried at 80 oC for 24 h to obtain Nb2O5@ploymer core-shell microspheres. The obtained Nb2O5@ploymer core-shell microspheres were treated with the followed post-processing: (Step I) calcination in air flow at 600 oC for 2 h with heating rate 2 oC min−1 to obtain o-Nb2O5 hollow microspheres; (Step II) carbonization at 800 oC for 2 h with heating rate 3 oC min−1 under N2 flow to obtain t-NbO2@carbon core-shell microspheres; (Step III) a mild oxidation of t-NbO2@carbon core-shell microspheres in air flow at 300 oC for 2h, and t-NbO2 phase could transfer into o-Nb2O5 phase. The synthesis of pure carbon microspheres is similar to that for composite microspheres but without adding the C4H4NNbO9•xH2O. The obtained RF polymeric microspheres were carbonized at 800 oC for 2 h with heating rate 3 oC min−1 under N2 flow.

Characterization

The crystal structure of all the samples was identified by a powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns with a RigakuD/max 2550 diffractometer operating at 40 kV and 20 mA using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). The Raman spectra was recorded at room temperature on a Spex 1403 Raman spectrometer with an argon ion laser at an excitation wavelength of 514.5 nm. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was performed using a VG Multilab 2000 with Al Kα as the X-ray source. The surface morphology and microstructure were observed on field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI-300) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL, 2100F). Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms were measured at 77 K with a Quadrasorb SI analyser. Before the measurements, all samples were degassed under vacuum at 453 K for 12 h. Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method was utilized to calculate the specific surface areas. The total pore volume was calculated using a single point at a relative pressure of 0.985. The pore size distributions were derived from the desorption branch using Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) model. Thermogravimetric analysis (TA Instrument Q600 Analyser) was carried out in air flow rate of 100 mL min−1 from room temperature to 800 oC at a rate of 10 oC min−1.

Electrochemical tests

The electrode slurry was prepared by mixing the as-prepared material, carbon black (Timical super C65) and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) binder in a 8:1:1 weight ratio in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP). Then the slurry was uniformly casted onto Cu foil, dried in a 100 oC vacuum oven overnight, and punched into electrodes with a diameter of 12 mm and a thickness of 50 μm (not include Cu foil). Electrochemical tests were performed in 3-electrode system with the obtained samples as working electrode, overcapacitive activated carbons and lithium foil as the counter and reference electrode, respectively. 1 M LiPF6 in EC/DMC/EMC (V/V, 1:1:1) was employed as the electrolyte, the separator was a microporous membrane (Celgard 2400). Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was conducted on a PCI-4/300 potentiostat (Gamry, USA) and galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) tests was conducted on the Arbin BT2000 system. All the soft cells were assembled in an argon filled glove box at 25 oC and each cell need to be injected 0.5 mL electrolyte. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) were tested in the potential range between 1.0 V and 3.0 V at room temperature. The weight of active materials (Nb2O5 or NbO2) in electrode was used to calculate the gravimetrically normalized current and capacitance.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Kong, L. et al. Nanoarchitectured Nb2O5 hollow, Nb2O5@carbon and NbO2@carbon Core-Shell Microspheres for Ultrahigh-Rate Intercalation Pseudocapacitors. Sci. Rep. 6, 21177; doi: 10.1038/srep21177 (2016).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep21177-s1.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by MOST (2014CB239702) and National Science Foundation of China (No. 51302083, No. 51172071, No.51272077), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and Shanghai Rising-Star Program.

Footnotes

Author Contributions L.P.K. and D.H.L. designed the experiments. L.P.K. performed the experiments and prepared all figures. C.F.Z., J.T.W., W.M.Q. and L.C.L. involved in the scientific discussions. L.P.K. and D.H.L. co-wrote the main manuscript text paper. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

References

  1. Conway B. E. Electrochemical Supercapacitors: Scientific Fundamentals and Technological Applications, Ch. 2, 11–32 (Kluwer Academicr Plenum, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  2. Miller J. R. & Simon P. Electrochemical Capacitors for Energy Management. Science 321, 651–652 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Simon P. & Gogotsi Y. Materials for electrochemical capacitors. Nat. Mater. 7, 845–854 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu C., Li F., Ma L. P. & Cheng H. M. Advanced Materials for Energy Storage. Adv. Mater. 22, E28–E62 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang G. P., Zhang L. & Zhang J. J. A review of electrode materials for electrochemical supercapacitors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 797–828 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang L. L. & Zhao X. S. Carbon-based materials as supercapacitor electrodes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 2520–2531 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Simon P., Gogotsi Y. & Dunn B. Where Do Batteries End and Supercapacitors Begin. Science Magazine. 343, 1210–1211 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Augustyn V., Simon P. & Dunn B. Pseudocapacitive oxide materials for high-rate electrochemical energy storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 1597–1614 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  9. Wu Z. S. et al. Graphene/metal oxide composite electrode materials for energy storage. Nano Energy 1, 107–131 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  10. Rudge A. et al. Conducting polymers as active materials in electrochemical capacitors. J. Power Sources 47, 89–107 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  11. Herrero E., Buller L. J. & Abrun H. D. Underpotential deposition at single crystal surfaces of Au, Pt, Ag and other materials. Chem. Rev. 101, 1897–1930 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zheng J. P., Cygan P. J. & Jow T. R. Hydrous ruthenium oxide as an electrode material for electrochemical capacitors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 142, 2699–2703 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  13. Brousse T. et al. Crystalline MnO2 as possible alternatives to amorphous compounds in electrochemical supercapacitors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 153, A2171–A2180 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  14. Wei T. Y. et al. A cost-effective supercapacitor material of ultrahigh specific capacitances: spinel nickel cobaltite aerogels from an epoxide-driven sol-gel process. Adv. Mater. 22, 347–351 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gurunathan K. et al. Electrochemically synthesised conducting polymeric materials for applications towards technology in electronics, optoelectronics and energy storage devices. Mater. Chem. Phys. 61, 173–191 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  16. Snooka G. A., Kao P. & Best A. S. Conducting-polymer-based supercapacitor devices and electrodes. J. Power Sources 196, 1–12 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  17. Mastragostino M., Arbizzani C. & Soavi F. Conducting polymers as electrode materials in supercapacitors. Solid State Ionics 148, 493–498 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  18. Augustyn V. et al. High-rate electrochemical energy storage through Li+ intercalation pseudocapacitance. Nat. Mater. 12, 518–522 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim J. W., Augustyn V. & Dunn B. The Effect of Crystallinity on the Rapid Pseudocapacitive Response of Nb2O5. Adv. Energy Mater. 2, 141–148 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  20. Lukatskaya M. R. et al. Cation Intercalation and High Volumetric Capacitance of Two-Dimensional Titanium Carbide. Science 341, 1502–1505 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mefford J. T. et al. Anion charge storage through oxygen intercalation in LaMnO3 perovskite pseudocapacitor electrodes. Nat. Mater. 13, 726–732 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cava R. J. et al. Electrical and magnetic properties of Nb2O5-δ crystallographic shear structures. Phys. Rev. B 44, 6973–6981 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Viet A. L. et al. Nanostructured Nb2O5 polymorphs by electrospinning for rechargeable lithium batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 664–671 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang J., Polleux J., Lim J. & Dunn B. Pseudocapacitive contributions to electrochemical energy storage in TiO2 (Anatase) nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 14925–14931 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  25. Arico A. S. et al. Nanostructured materials for advanced energy conversion and storage devices. Nat. Mater. 4, 366–377 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jamnik J. & Maier J. Nanocrystallinity effects in lithium battery materials Aspects of nano-ionics. Part IV. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 5, 5215–5220 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang X. L. et al. High-performance supercapacitors based on nanocomposites of Nb2O5 nanocrystals and carbon nanotubes. Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 1089–1093 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang C. F. et al. Synthesis and electrochemical properties of niobium pentoxide deposited on layered carbide-derived carbon. J. Power Sources 274, 121–129 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  29. Kong L. P. et al. High-power and high-energy asymmetric supercapacitors based on Li+-intercalation into a T-Nb2O5/graphene pseudocapacitive electrode. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 17962–17970 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  30. Wei M., Wei K., Ichihara M. & Zhou H. Nb2O5 nanobelts: A lithium intercalation host with large capacity and high rate capability. Electrochem. Commun. 10, 980–983 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen Z. et al. High-Performance Supercapacitors Based on Intertwined CNT/V2O5 Nanowire Nanocomposites. Adv. Mater. 23, 791–795 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hu L. et al. Symmetrical MnO2-Carbon Nanotube-Textile Nanostructures for Wearable Pseudocapacitors with High Mass Loading. ACS Nano 5, 8904–8913 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kodama R., Terada Y., Nakai I., Komaba S. & Kumagai N. Electrochemical and in Situ XAFS-XRD Investigation of Nb2O5 for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 153, A583–A588 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  34. Palatnikov M., Shcherbina O., Sidorov N. & Bormanis K. The structure of niobium and tantalum oxides processed by concentrated light flux. Ukr. J. Phys. Opt. 13, a-h (2012). [Google Scholar]
  35. Jehng J. M. & Wachs I. E. Structural chemistry and Raman spectra of niobium oxides. Chem. Mater. 3, 100–107 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  36. Rahman M. M. et al. A vein-like nanoporous network of Nb2O5 with a higher lithium intercalation discharge cut-off voltage. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 11019–11025 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  37. Lin X. et al. Novel counter electrode catalysts of niobium oxides supersede Pt for dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Commun. 47, 11489–11491 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhao Y., Zhang Z. J. & Lin Y. H. Optical and dielectric properties of a nanostructured NbO2 thin film prepared by thermal oxidation. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 37, 3392–3395 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhang L. et al. Highly corrosion resistant platinum-niobium oxide-carbon nanotube electrodes for the oxygen reduction in PEM fuel cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 6156–6172 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  40. Atuchin V. V., Kalabin I. E., Kesler V. G. & Pervukhina N. V. Nb 3d and O 1s core levels and chemical bonding in niobates. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 142, 129–134 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang W. B. et al. The investigation of NbO2 and Nb2O5 electronic structure by XPS, UPS and first principles methods. Surf. Interface Anal. 45, 1206–1210 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  42. Lim E. et al. Advanced hybrid supercapacitor based on a mesoporous niobium pentoxide/carbon as high performance anode. ACS nano 8, 8968–8978 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lindstrom H. et al. Li+ Ion Insertion in TiO2 (Anatase). 2. Voltammetry on Nanoporous Films. J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 7717–7722 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  44. Lubimtsev A., Kent P. R. C., Sumpter B. & Ganesh P. Understanding the origin of high-rate intercalation pseudocapacitance in Nb2O5 crystals. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 14951–14956 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  45. Nelson P. Introduction to Inorganic Chemistry, Ch. 4, 22–30 (Ventus, 2011). [Google Scholar]
  46. Orel B., Maček M., Grdadolnik J. & Meden A. In situ UV-Vis and ex situ IR spectro electrochemical investigations of amorphous and crystalline electrochromic Nb2O5 films in charged/discharged states. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2, 221–236 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  47. Moshopoulou E., Bordet P. & Capponi J. Superstructure and superconductivity in Li1−xNbO2 (x ≈ 0.7) single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 59, 9590–9599 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  48. Geselbracht M., Richardson T. & Stacy A. Superconductivity in the layered compound LixNbO2. Nature 345, 324–326 (1990). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep21177-s1.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES