Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 19.
Published in final edited form as: Neuron. 2015 Aug 19;87(4):751–763. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.08.006

Figure 2. The Fra ICD is sufficient to fully rescue comm expression and partially rescue midline crossing defects in commissural neurons of fra mutants.

Figure 2

A) Fluorescent in situ hybridization for comm mRNA (green) in stage 14 embryos. Anterior is up. The cell bodies and axons of EW neurons are labeled with eg-Gal4 driving expression of UAS-Tau-Myc-GFP. Anti-Myc immunostaining is shown in magenta. White circles indicate the positions of EW neuron cell bodies. Solid circles indicate EW neurons that express comm and dotted circles indicate EW neurons that do not express comm. Open arrowheads indicate segments in which EW axons fail to cross the midline.

B) Quantification of EW axon crossing in stage 14 embryos. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, followed by Student's t-test. *** indicates p<0.0001, compared to fra3 mutants. ** indicates p=0.0002, compared to fra3 mutants. Error bars indicate SEM. Number in parentheses indicates number of embryos scored. Note that the data for fra3 heterozygotes and mutants are also shown in Figures 6A and S3.

C) Quantification of comm expression in EW neurons in stage 14 embryos. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, followed by Student's t-test. *** indicates p<0.0001, compared to fra3 mutants. * indicates p<0.01, compared to fra mutants. Error bars indicate SEM. Number in parentheses indicates number of embryos scored. Note that the data for fra3 heterozygotes and mutants are also shown in Figures 6B and S2.