Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 16;15:88. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1158-0

Table 1.

Summary of capacity for high-throughput and potential for field applicability of microscopy, RDT and novel nucleic acid amplification platforms

Diagnostic modality Platform Limit of detection (parasites/µL) Number of samples processed (per assay or per day) Validated on symptomatic or microscopy positive samples Validated on asymptomatic or surveillance samples Assay evaluated in resource-limited setting Costa
Microscopy Light microscopy [65] 50–499 15 min/slidec Yes Yes Yes $
RDT Immunochromatographic lateral flow assayb [8] 200 15–20 min/testd Yes Yes Yes $
PCR Ultrasensitive qPCR [32] 0.022 (blood) 40 samples/day (manual)
140 samples/day (automated)
Yes No No $$
Multiplex Malaria Sample Ready [34] 0.244 (blood) uncertain Uncertain Uncertain Yes $$
Mobile PCR [35] 2 (DBS) 96 well plate, 240 samples/day Uncertain Yes Yes $$
PET-PCR [37, 38] 3.2 (blood) Real-time PCR platform, presumed 72 samples Uncertain Yes No ?
Gelcycler [39] 2 (blood) 12 Yes Yes No $
Multiplex microarray assay [40] Uncertain Uncertain Yes Uncertain No $$
CLIP-PCR [42] 0.3 (DBS) 96 well plate + pooled DBS Yes Yes No $
LAMP RealAmp [58] 0.4–40 (blood) 8 tubes Yes Yes Yes $$
HtLAMP [57] 2.5 (blood) 96 well plate Yes No Yes $
LAMP-LFD [60] Uncertain 1.5 h/test Yes No No ?
NINA-LAMP [63] Uncertain 5 tubes Yes Yes Yes ?
LoopAmp [51] 5 (blood) 16 Yes Yes Yes ?

DBS dried blood spot

a$ < $US2; $$ > $US2, ? = cost unknown

bMalaria Rapid Diagnostic Test Performance—results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs Round 5 (2013)

cWHO Malaria Microscopy Quality Assurance Manual Version 1, 2009

dCDC website ww.cdc.gov/malaria/malaria_worldwide/reduction/dx_rdt.html