Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 16.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1761–1770. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5214

Table 3.

Clinicians Decision-Making Quality Outcomes

Usual Care
(N=139)a
Decision Aid
(N=158)a
Mean
Difference
(95%CI)b
P-Value

Continuous outcomes, mean (95%CI)b

Decisional Conflict(0=conflict, 100=comfort)
  Informed subscale 65.3 (61.5, 69.1) 79.1 (76.8, 81.5) 14.4 (7.1, 21.6) <0.0001
  Clarity subscale 66.8 (62.2,69.4) 85.3 (83.0, 87.6) 19.9 (11.9, 27.9) <0.0001
  Support subscale 72.1 (69.1, 75.1) 79.2 (76.7, 81.7) 6.6 (1.8, 11.4)) 0.007
  Uncertainty subscale 64.4 (60.6, 68.3) 74.1 (71.2, 77.1) 9.2 (3.4, 15.0) 0.002
  Effectiveness subscale 71.8 (68.9, 74.8) 81.2 (78.9, 83.5) 9.1 (3.9, 14.2) 0.001
  Overall 68.3 (65.4, 71.2) 79.7 (77.6, 81.8) 11.4 (5.7, 17.1) <0.0001
    Missing,c n (%) 18 (13.1) 17 (10.9)

Involvement of patients in the decision-making processd 32.5 (28.5, 36.6) 46.6 (42.3, 50.8) 15.8 (6.5, 25.9) 0.001
  Missing, n (%) 100 (71.9) 101 (63.9)

Categorical Outcomes, n (%) RR (95%CI)e

Satisfaction,f satisfied extremely satisfied 74 (54.0) 119 (76.3) 1.64 (1.25, 2.16) 0.02
  Missing 22 (16.1) 19 (12.2)
a

N=number of encounters (i.e. multiple entries per clinician);

b

95% confidence intervals;

c

Reported as the highest proportion of missing across items;

d

OPTION scores (12 items, 0–100 scale, 0= no involvement), inter-rater agreement calculated as Shrout & Fleiss’ ICC=0.96;

e

Relative Risk;

f

1 item, 5-point likert scale, reporting proportion of satisfied /extremely satisfied.