TABLE 8.
|μ| (Debye) |
TR()(Å3) |
〈|μ|〉 (Debye) |
ε
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
molecule | QM | Drude | QM | Drude | CP | Drude | GK, Drude | expt1 | Drude |
acetamide | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.9 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 5.8 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 66.3 | 66 ± 3 |
NMA | 3.9 | 3.9 | 7.8 | 7.9 | *5.9 | 5.7 | 4.6 ± 0.6 | 100 | 92 ± 5 |
N,N-dimethyl acetamide | 4.0 | 3.9 | 9.6 | 9.5 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 26 | 23 ± 1 |
Properties of the Drude polarizable model are compared with QM and experimental data. The Drude model corresponds to the optimal choice of LJ parameters from the unscaled/vthole class of electrostatic models. Included is the gas-phase dipole (|μ|) and trace of the molecular polarizability (). Also included is the average molecular dipole 〈|μ|〉 and Kirkwood GK factor calculated from neat liquid simulations at 373 K and the corresponding dielectric constant calculated from eq 7. The NMA CP simulation was run at T = 308 K where 〈|μ|〉 = 6.0 Debye.86 We estimate a drop in of ≈0.1 Debye for a simulation run at T = 373 K on the basis of the behavior of the Drude polarizable model.