Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 16;13:22. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0343-4

Table 3.

Relationship between perceived safety from crime and walking inside the neighbourhood (min/week)

Variable Model 1 Demographics Model 2 Built environment Model 3 Social cohesion Model 4 Perceptions
Estimate (SE) p Estimate (SE) p Estimate (SE) p Estimate (SE) p
Total walking 18.04 (3.50) 0.0001 18.77 (3.50) 0.0001 13.53 (3.61) 0.0002 10.54 (3.97) 0.0079
Walking for recreation 13.51 (2.36) 0.0001 13.70 (2.37) 0.0001 10.25 (2.46) 0.0001 7.01 (2.70) 0.0096
Walking for transport 3.18 (1.27) 0.0127 3.56 (1.27) 0.0051 1.38 (1.31) 0.2922 0.68 (1.44) 0.6378

Proc Mixed marginal model with unrestricted variance pattern

Model 1 adjusts for age, gender, income, education, marital status, importance of safety from crime to neighbourhood selection and time

Model 2: Model 1 + residential density, street connectivity and local destinations

Model 3: Model 2 + perceptions of neighbourhood social cohesion

Model 4: Model 3 + perceptions of aesthetics, traffic and street lighting

Bold denotes significant p-value