Table IV.
Semen variables for the men in cohort B at different ages.
Age (years) | 19 | 21 | 25 | 29 | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | 197 | 110 | 96 | 90 | |
Semen volume (ml) | 3.4 (3.5) 0.6–9.0 |
3.5 (3.6) 0.4–10.9 |
3.7 (3.9) 1.0–8.9 |
3.5(3.8) 0.8–8.9 |
0.51 19y versus 21y 0.09 19y versus 25y 0.59 19y versus 29y 0.79 21y versus 25y 1.00 21y versus 29y 0.96 25y versus 29y |
Sperm concentration (million/ml) | 50 (63) 0–274 |
57 (63) 0–263 |
46 (57) 0–195 |
62 (71) 0–171 |
0.96 19y versus 21y 0.43 19y versus 25y 0.09 19y versus 29y 0.76 21y versus 25y 0.03 21y versus 29y 0.007 25y versus 29y |
Total sperm count (million) | 172 (199) 0–785 |
171 (209) 0–975 |
168 (217) 0–1361.7 |
225 (264) 0–1077 |
1.00 19y versus 21y 1.00 19y versus 25y 0.009 19y versus 29y 0.02 21y versus 29y 1.00 21y versus 25y 0.02 25y versus 29y |
Motility (abc, %) | 76 (73) 18–91 |
79 (76) 21–93 |
82 (77) 21–94 |
81 (76) 18–96 |
0.02 19y versus 21y 0.002 19y versus 25y 0.03 19y versus 29y 0.85 21y versus 25y 0.90 21y versus 29y 1.00 25y versus 29y |
Total motile count (million) | 130 (148) 0–573 |
132 (162) 0–711 |
138 (174) 0–1034 |
183 (210) 0–717 |
0.88 19y versus 21y 0.73 19y versus 25y <0.001 19y versus 29y 0.99 21y versus 25y 0.01 21y versus 29y 0.02 25y versus 29y |
P-value <0.05 is considered significant, shown in bold. Results are shown as median (mean) and range. Mixed model of repeated measures analyses following a square root transformation was used. P-values for pairwise comparisons were adjusted using the Tukey–Kramer methods. For other adjustments see statistical methods.