Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 5;31(3):502–510. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev328

Table V.

Semen variables of the men in the cohort B, who participated at all ages.

Age (years) 19 21 25 29 P-value*
n 52 52 52 52
Volume (ml) 3.8 (3.8)
1.1–8.7
3.8 (4.0)
0.4–10.9
4.0 (4.1)
1.6–8.9
3.4 (3.9)
0.8–7.9
0.94 19y versus 21y
0.86 19y versus 25y
1.00 19y versus 29y
1.00 21y versus 25y
0.93 21y versus 29y
0.86 25y versus 29y
Concentration (million/ml) 54 (65)
0–266
59 (61)
0–160
57 (56)
0–153
69 (74)
0–160
0.99 19y versus 21y
0.56 19y versus 25y
0.12 19y versus 29y
0.53 21y versus 25y
0.03 21y versus 29y
0.005 25y versus 29y
Total count (million) 202 (233)
0–701
192 (229)
0–928
193 (222)
0–1362
233 (280)
0–1077
1.00 19y versus 21y
0.72 19y versus 25y
0.16 19y versus 29y
0.79 21y versus 25y
0.13 21y versus 29y
0.02 25y versus 29y
Motility (abc, %) 76 (74)
47–88
82 (78)
21–93
83 (79)
44–92
82 (78)
18–94
0.04 19y versus 21y
0.05 19y versus 25y
0.20 19y versus 29y
1.00 21y versus 25y
0.99 21y versus 29y
1.00 25y versus 29y
Normal morphology (%) 7.3 (7.6)
0–19
n= 51
8.5 (8.4)
0–19
n= 49
8.0 (8.5)
1–21
n= 49
9.0 (9.7)
0–20.5
n= 51
0.22 19y versus 21y
0.59 19y versus 25y
0.001 19y versus 29y
0.91 21y versus 25y
0.04 21y versus 29y
0.02 25y versus 29y
Total motile count (million) 142 (173)
0–558
161 (183)
0–711
153 (180)
0–1034
193 (192)
0–979
1.00 19y versus 21y
0.92 19y versus 25y
0.005 19y versus 29y
0.81 21y versus 25y
0.04 21y versus 29y
0.007 25y versus 29y

P-value <0.05 is considered significant, shown in bold. Results are shown as median (mean) and range. Mixed model of repeated measures analyses following a square root transformation was used. P-values for pairwise comparisons were adjusted using the Tukey–Kramer methods. For other adjustments see statistical methods.