Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Mem Lang. 2014 Dec 11;79-80:18–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.11.001

Table 3.

Summary of statistical effects by region for Experiment 1. Asterisks indicate significant effects. Absolute values of t > 2 were considered significant at a p < .05 level. All models contained random slopes for all fixed effects and their interaction by subject and item except for Region 4, which had only by-subject random slopes for these effects.

Estimate S.E. t value
Region 1 (Intercept) 726.41 55.55 13.10*
Condition 3.06 16.67 -0.18
Load -6.48 10.60 -0.61
Region 2 (Intercept) 756.26 40.73 18.57*
Condition -57.81 21.17 -2.73*
Load -24.17 14.77 -1.64
Region 3 (Intercept) 485.29 19.52 24.86*
Condition -7.01 10.59 -0.66
Load -10.48 5.64 -1.86
Region 4 (Intercept) 491.50 23.32 21.60*
Condition 12.83 9.05 1.42
Load -4.76 5.40 -0.88
Region 5 (Intercept) 780.52 50.31 15.51*
Condition -1.04 16.63 0.06
Load 12.10 10.35 1.17
Region 6 (Intercept) 549.28 27.97 19.37*
Condition -4.11 12.84 -0.32
Load 12.10 7.99 -0.86
Region 7 (Intercept) 1077.1 68.97 14.62*
Condition 29.81 21.08 1.41
Load 38.40 15.42 2.49*