Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 15;4:e11389. doi: 10.7554/eLife.11389

Figure 1. Most sister kinetochores are not unified and attach to two discrete k-fibers during meiosis I in human oocytes.

(A) Maximum intensity z-projection immunofluorescence images of kinetochores and chromosomes in meiosis I oocytes from young donors (≤30 years old). Representative examples from 5 different oocytes. Scale bar represents 1 µm. (B) Categories of sister kinetochore configurations shown in (A) and their frequency in oocytes from young donors (≤30 years old). 1,051 kinetochore pairs from 23 oocytes were analyzed. (C) Examples of kinetochore configurations from 26 human oocytes across all age groups in which sister kinetochores are separated (marked with white arrows). Scale bar represents 1 µm. (D) Maximum intensity z-projection immunofluorescence images of microtubules and distinct sister kinetochore pairs in cold-treated meiotic spindles from human oocytes across all age groups. Drawings illustrate the different modes of microtubule attachments in the immunofluorescence images. Scale bar represents 5 µm in overview and 1 µm in insets. (E) Quantification of the number of individual k-fibers attaching to sister kinetochore pairs. 949 attachments from 25 cold-treated human oocytes from donors across all age groups were evaluated. (F) Frequency of the different modes of kinetochore-microtubule attachments shown in (D).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11389.003

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. The majority of sister kinetochores are split during meiosis I in human oocytes.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

Representative images of kinetochores from 5 human oocytes co-labelled with CREST (magenta) and Hec1 (green). Schemes on top of the panel show the different kinetochore configurations as determined from Hec1 labelling. Arrows of the same colour highlight sister kinetochores. Scale bar represents 1 µm.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Sister kinetochore separation is already evident in the initial stages of spindle assembly.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

Representative bivalents from 3 different human oocytes fixed before completion of bipolar spindle assembly are shown. Arrows of the same colour highlight sister kinetochores. Scale bar represents 5 µm in overview and 1 µm in insets.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3. Sister kinetochores can interact with k-fibers that originate from different regions of the meiotic spindle.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3.

(A) Illustrations and representative images of k-fiber attachment types to unified sister kinetochore pairs in cold-treated human oocyte spindles. Arrows indicate attachment types defined in (1D). Scale bar represents 1 µm. (B) Illustrations and representative images of k-fiber attachment types to distinct kinetochore pairs in cold-treated human oocyte spindles. Arrows indicate attachment types defined in (1D). Scale bar represents 1 µm. (C) Illustrations and representative images of k-fiber attachment types to separated kinetochore pairs in cold-treated human oocyte spindles. Arrows indicate attachment types defined in (1D). Scale bar represents 1 µm.

Figure 1—figure supplement 4. Individual kinetochores can attach to multiple k-fibers during meiosis I in human oocytes.

Figure 1—figure supplement 4.

Illustrations and representative images of kinetochore-microtubule interactions in cold-treated human oocyte spindles showing multiple k-fiber attachments (indicated by arrows) to individual kinetochore pairs. Scale bar represents 1 µm.