Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2015 Dec 17;127:387–408. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.009

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Examples of running priors. From left to right: Raw MR image (column 1), atlas-based ( PSUBJATLAS) (column 2), patch-based (column 3) and PBAEM (column 4) tissue probability map of, from top to bottom, GM, WM, VENT, DGM and sCSF of one subject as an example. Tissue probability on a scale 0 – 100. Red arrows: PBAEM tissue probability is more accurate than the atlas-based one; Blue arrows: PBAEM tissue probability is more accurate than the patch-based one.