Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 15.

Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2015 Dec 17;127:387–408. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.009

Table 2.

Comparison of average HDs and MDs of 31 subjects between PBAEM-SVS and atlas-based EM technique. Lowest HDs and MDs are bold.

Tissue Class	EM w/Atlas-based Prior		PBAEM-SVS
Tissue Class	MD	HD	MD	HD
GM	0.17 ± 0.04	5.58 ± 1.11	0.13^* ± 0.03	5.79 ± 1.19
WM	0.12 ± 0.10	5.67 ± 2.15	0.09^* ± 0.06	5.64 ± 1.89
VENT	0.35 ± 0.30	23.61 ± 6.24	0.23^* ± 0.15	19.78^* ± 6.10
sCSF	0.31 ± 0.09	9.45 ± 1.90	0.26^* ± 0.06	9.60 ± 1.88
DGM	0.08^* ± 0.03	5.13 ± 9.62	0.09 ± 0.03	3.94 ± 0.89

^*

indicates statistical significance with P < 0.05 from pair-wise two-tailed t-test between the two methods.