Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2015 Dec 5;127:307–323. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.069

Table A.2.

Effectsa for the localizer contrast (sentences > nonwords)b and for the critical contrast (object-extracted > subject-extracted) in the extended language system

fROI Localizer effect Syntactic complexity effect
Right hemisphere homologues of “core” language regions
  RIFGorb t=3.71; p<0.005 t<1; n.s.
  RIFG t=3.89; p<0.005 t=2.19; p<0.05
  RMFG t=2.05; p<0.05 t=1.23; n.s.
  RAntTemp t=5.37; p<10−4 t<1; n.s.
  RMidAntTemp t=3.75; p<0.005 t<1; n.s.
  RMidPostTemp t=5.67; p<10−4 t=2.39; p<0.05
  RPostTemp t=4.44; p<10−3 t<1; n.s.
  RAngG t=2.59; p<0.05 t<1; n.s.
Medial frontal cortex region
  LSFG t=5.51; p<10−4 t<1; n.s.
Cerebellar regions
  RCereb t=4.63; p<10−3 t=1.88; p<0.05
  LCereb t=6.28; p<10−4 t<1; n.s.
a

We report uncorrected p values (df=12).

b

Estimated in data not used for defining the fROIs, using across-runs cross-validation.