Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2016 Feb;20(2):304–316. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1201-0

Diverse Rates of Depression Among Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) Across India: Insights from a Multi-site Mixed Method Study

Cecilia Tomori 1,, Allison M McFall 1, Aylur K Srikrishnan 2, Shruti H Mehta 1, Sunil S Solomon 3, Santhanam Anand 2, Canjeevaram K Vasudevan 2, Suniti Solomon 2, David D Celentano 1
PMCID: PMC4755908  NIHMSID: NIHMS724549  PMID: 26386592

Abstract

Poor psychosocial health contributes to HIV risk behavior and reduced engagement in treatment and care. This study investigates depression and its correlates among 11,992 MSM recruited via respondent driven sampling in 12 cities across India using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and supplemented by analysis of qualitative research from 15 sites with 363 MSM. Overall prevalence of depression was 11 %, with substantial variation across sites and subgroups of MSM, and high prevalence of suicidal thoughts among depressed MSM. In multivariable analyses identification as a kothi (feminine sexual identity) [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.91], disclosure of being MSM to non-family (aOR = 1.7) and family (aOR = 2.4), disclosure of HIV-status (aOR = 5.6), and substance use were associated with significantly higher odds of depression. Qualitative results emphasized dire social consequences of disclosing MSM- and HIV- status, especially to family, including suicidality. Combination prevention interventions should include mental health services that address disclosure, suicidality, and substance use.

Keywords: Men who have sex with men, HIV, Depression, Suicidality, India

Introduction

Men who have sex with men (MSM) experience a disproportionately high prevalence of HIV worldwide, with expanding epidemics despite the growing availability of effective HIV treatment [1, 2]. In India, the prevalence of HIV is estimated to be 12 times higher among MSM than among men overall [3]. Homosexuality is criminalized in Section 377 of the Penal Code and stigmatization of homosexuality and discrimination remain pervasive, limiting access to HIV-related services and contributing to poor psychosocial health [48]. Qualitative research has found numerous negative life experiences among MSM, including childhood sexual abuse, lack of family- and community- acceptance, pressure to marry, harassment and violence [6, 813]. Both qualitative and quantitative studies have identified significant psychosocial concerns among MSM in India, including high levels of psychological distress, depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, and substance use [4, 5, 7, 8, 1422]. These psychosocial factors are associated with increased HIV-risk behaviors and poorer HIV outcomes, including more frequent unprotected anal sex, lower testing rates, and reduced engagement in HIV care and treatment [4, 7, 9, 11, 19, 20, 23, 24]. Following the minority stress model [25], depression has been conceptualized as a co-occurring condition with HIV risk-behaviors, constituting a “syndemic” [5, 26].

Prior quantitative research on depression among MSM in India (from Chennai [7, 15], Kumbakonam [7], Mumbai [20], Kolkata [16] and Ahmedabad [22]) indicates that MSM are at risk for depression, with estimates ranging from 29 to 55 % [7, 15, 20]. These reports mainly rely on convenience sampling, usually collected in the context of HIV- and MSM-related outreach work by non-governmental organization (NGOs) and at STD clinics. The interpretation of these results is complicated by India’s geographic, cultural and religious diversity, which may shape MSM psychosocial health on a local level [7], and by the sociocultural context of male-to-male sexual behavior in India [12, 2733]. Research has focused on three main Indian MSM sexual identities: kothi [more feminine in behavior and dress, who predominately engage in receptive anal intercourse (AI)], panthi or girya (more masculine in appearance, who predominately engage in insertive AI) and double deckers (may have masculine or feminine appearance, and engage in both receptive and insertive AI), alongside gay, bisexual, and MSM identities, which may be situationally fluid and change over time [12, 2734]. Qualitative studies indicate that kothis may be particularly vulnerable to multiple levels of stigmatization, discrimination, and violence in their families and communities [8, 9, 11, 24]. Kothis are more likely to participate in transactional sex and sex work for economic support, which contributes to higher risk of violence and greater vulnerability to HIV [9, 11, 24, 3537]. Kothis’ feminine gender expression makes them recognizable [9, 11, 24], marking them as a visible target of stigmatization and discrimination [38]. Beyond identified high depression rates among kothi [7, 15], data on depression across sexual identities remains limited [15]. The purpose of this research is to assess depression and its correlates among a diverse sample of MSM in 12 cities across India using data from a large-scale, multi-sited mixed-methods study. Since previous research suggested that the prevalence of depression may be higher among kothis [7, 15], assessing the burden of depression across sexual identities among Indian MSM was an additional issue of interest.

Methods

Data for this research are drawn from a cluster-randomized HIV-prevention trial among MSM in India (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01686750) [39]. The primary aims of the trial are to provide an in-depth qualitative and quantitative characterization of MSM in relation to HIV-risk and uptake of HIV-related services in India and to assess the impact of an intervention to establish MSM-friendly HIV-services on HIV-risk behavior. Qualitative data for the present study are drawn from formative research for the cluster-randomized trial, which was used to inform the development of the baseline survey and recruitment for the trial and the design of the intervention arm of the study. The quantitative data are drawn from the baseline survey for the same trial.

Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis

As part of the formative qualitative research for the cluster-randomized trial, thirty-one focus group discussions (FGDs) and 121 in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted by trained interviewers with 363 MSM from 12 study sites and 3 additional sites (Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh; Tumkur, Karnataka; Trichy, Tamil Nadu) in local languages (Table 1). Participants were identified by local NGOs who provide services for MSM and by peers based on their knowledge about and/or involvement in outreach work with MSM. FGDs and IDIs addressed a wide-range of topics related to the experiences of MSM in their communities and the availability and accessibility of HIV-related services for MSM, using open-ended questions whenever possible. Participants who reported high levels of distress and possible suicidality were referred to trained counselors for assistance. Participants were compensated for their time. FGDs and IDIs were transcribed, translated into English and entered into Atlas.TI qualitative software (version 7, Scientific Software Development GmbH, Eden Prarie, MN). Transcripts were read multiple times, emergent themes were identified through the constant comparison method, refined, and used to develop a preliminary codebook that was elaborated based on discussion [40, 41]. In presenting the qualitative results below, we specifically summarize the main themes that either directly address or are related to depression. Quotations were selected to illustrate each of these themes. Finally, qualitative findings provided insight into possible interpretations of the results from the quantitative analyses below.

Table 1.

Formative research participant characteristics among 363 men who have sex with men in 15 Indian cities

State N IDI FGD Marital status
Sexual identity
N groups/N
individuals
Single Ever
married
Kothi Panthi/
Girya
Double
deckers
Bisexual Gay
Madhya Pradesh 24 8 2/16 15 9 4 6 3 2 9
Uttar Pradesh 23 8 2/15 18 5 9 3 8 3 0
Delhi 20 8 2/12 12 8 8 6 5 1 0
Andhra Pradesh 96 32 8/64 55 41 46 19 26 5 0
Karnataka 107 33 9/74 62 45 41 6 35 23 2
Tamil Nadu 93 32 8/61 52 41 40 15 37 0 1
Total (%) 363 121 (33.3) 31/242 (66.6) 214 (59.0) 149 (41.0) 148 (40.8) 55 (15.2) 114 (31.4) 34 (9.4) 12 (3.3)

IDI in-depth interviews, FGD focus group discussions

Quantitative Methods

Study Design

The quantitative study was conducted in 12 cities from six states of India as part of the baseline assessment of the cluster-randomized trial referenced above (Fig. 1) [39]. Study participant eligibility criteria included: (1) age ≥18 years; (2) self-identify as male; (3) report oral or anal sex with another man in the prior 12 months; (4) provide informed consent; and (5) possess a valid RDS referral coupon (except for “seeds”). Participants who self-identified as female or transgender (hijra) were excluded.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Prevalence of depression among men who have sex with men in 12 Indian cities

Study Procedures

Detailed study procedures for the baseline assessment have been published elsewhere [42]. Briefly, the study population was recruited utilizing respondent-driven sampling (RDS), a chain-referral strategy for recruiting hard-to-reach participants whereby the resulting sample is considered representative of the target population [39, 43, 44]. We initiated recruitment at each site with two ‘seeds’—individuals identified in the qualitative phase as well connected in the MSM communities. Target recruitment was 1000 per site. After verbal consent, participants completed an interviewer-administered survey and underwent rapid HIV testing and pre- and post-test counseling on-site. Each participant who completed the study was given two coupons to recruit other individuals from his network. Participants were reimbursed for participating in the study and for each eligible participant they recruited. Coupons were bar-coded to track recruitment chains and imprinted with a holographic image to hinder duplication. Enrollment was stopped when each site reached the target sample size.

Assessment of Depression

The presence of depression was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a self-reported questionnaire completed in the interviewer-administered survey, which measures depression severity over the last 2 weeks [45]. Each symptom or problem is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) and the 9 items are summed to calculate an overall depression score, ranging from 0 to 27, which corresponds to none (0–4), mild (5–9), moderate (10–14), moderately severe (15–19), and severe (20–27). As part of the depression assessment, the PHQ-9 contains one item on suicidal ideation. This item provides preliminary information on suicidality [45], and a potential screen for additional evaluation [46, 47], but not a full assessment that would entail the evaluation of suicidal intent and planning [48]. Men who reported frequent thoughts of personal harm or suicide were actively referred for counseling to a trained counselor or psychiatrist. The PHQ-9 has been validated and extensively used in India and found to have good internal reliability, (Cronbach’s α = 0.84 and 0.79), validity (sensitivity ≥0.87 and specificity ≥0.57), and discrimination properties (area under receiver operator curve = 0.84) [4951]. Within our sample of Indian MSM, internal reliability of the PHQ-9 was high (Cronbach’s α = 0.86). A meta-analysis on the optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression using the PHQ-9 found that there were no substantial differences in the pooled sensitivity and specificity for cut-offs between 8 and 11 [52]. Consistent with current depression research utilizing the PHQ-9 instrument, a cut-off of 10 or higher was used to characterize the presence of depression.

Statistical Analyses

Site-level prevalence of depression is estimated using the RDS-II estimator (Volz-Heckathorn estimator), which weights estimates for network size (i.e., the number of MSM in the city whom the participant saw in the prior 30 days). Population summary statistics for demographic, behavioral, and psychosocial factors are estimated with a composite weight, which accounts for the relative population size of adult men 15–59 years of age in each city [53] (assuming a similar proportion of MSM across cities) in addition to the RDS-II weight. Unweighted estimates are provided in supplemental tables.

Correlates of depression were identified using multilevel logistic regression models [using odds ratios OR)]. Models included random-intercepts for each site (to account for clustering) and incorporated scaled RDS-II sampling weights. Previous research on depression, with a focus on MSM both in India and in other settings, guided the development of a multivariable model [7, 15, 17, 20, 5457]. Several variables associated with depression in prior research, including sex work [15], stigma [7], and experiences of violence [57, 58], have also been previously noted to be more prevalent among certain sexual identity groups in India [7, 9, 11, 24, 3538]. Since sexual identity was a variable of interest, we examined the association between these variables and sexual identity to inform our final multivariable model. Collinearity between variables was assessed using 2 × 2 tables and variance inflation factors. Correlates were considered statistically significant if p value <0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using the RDS Analyst Software version 0.1 (http://hpmrg.org) and STATA version 12.0 (STATA Corp., College Station, Texas, USA).

Results

Qualitative Results

Qualitative findings across study sites suggest that MSM experience high levels of distress, anxiety, sadness, psychological injury, depression and suicidality. Reports of these negative psychological experiences clustered around several key areas: the psychological impact of stigmatization and harassment of MSM, and the inter-related fears and consequences of disclosure of same-sex sexual behavior and HIV-positive status. Participants overwhelmingly concurred that same-sex sexual behavior remains highly stigmatized in India and reported widespread harassment, violence, and resulting negative emotional consequences. Reports of violence were particularly common in the context of sex work. Kothis and some DDs specifically identified their feminine appearance or behavior as the basis for their systematic stigmatization, harassment, and violence, which led to emotional distress. Some participants explicitly linked these experiences to depression:

“Your son is like this, he behaves like a girl, can’t he be like a man,” and they also mock me and talk ill about me as well. When they treat men like that I get hurt and I feel very sad. For an example when I was in the college in my college I faced lots of discriminations, they used ask me whether am I girl or a boy finally I was in depression and due to that my education got discontinued (Karnataka, Bengaluru, 23, kothi)

As in the case of the above participant, these experiences of stigmatization and harassment had a profound impact on the ability of MSM to participate in everyday life, and often led MSM to maintain a more normative masculine appearance and conceal their sexual behavior.

Participants across different sexual identities feared the potential disclosure of their same-sex sexual behavior and its grave consequences, and expressed considerable emotional distress in relation to potential disclosure. Thoughts of suicide as a response in case of disclosure were common:

[My family] will be very upset and personally I would do something to myself rather than others coming to know about it. There is no use of me living in this world once people come to know about me. My family has supported me till now and if they come to know about me definitely they will be ashamed of me and in the society they will be tortured and so I have decided to commit suicide once they come to know (Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, 23, DD)

Several married participants identified suicide as the only possible response to disclosure, since they believed that they had no alternative:

[If it is disclosed that I have sex with men] I can simply commit suicide, that’s all. If it’s known to the family members then first of all I have to commit suicide only, no other way. If I leave my wife and children then there will be quarrel in family and will have some hurdles also. As well I can’t leave my children, wife and go somewhere, so only possibility is to commit suicide. (Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, 26, kothi)

Several participants reported previous suicide attempts because of their family’s knowledge of them being an MSM and many more heard of others who had attempted suicide:

Yes my parents know my status [being an MSM]; they used to scold me often regarding this one. Vexed, I even tried to commit suicide by, I drank pesticide, since then they stopped scolding me fearing that I may try something like that again. In 2011 I was forced into marriage (Andhra Pradesh, Visakhapatnam, 27, kothi)

Despite concern about the participant’s suicidality, this family and some others in our study forced the participant into marriage, compounding these men’s difficulties.

Qualitative findings also underscored the psychosocial consequences of HIV-infection. MSM were very distressed about the potential consequences of becoming infected and the social consequences of disclosure:

If I am known as a HIV positive everyone will abandon me. My friends and family both will leave me. Sometimes even the MSM are spared by the society but once they know we are positive it will be highly discriminated. Once the non-community comes to know the person’s status it will stop talking to him and think he has a contagious disease and it may spread to them. This will pain the person and he will become very depressed. If a person does not talk to a HIV positive person he will become more mentally depressed. “No one is talking to me. My friends are avoiding me. Why should I live?”, and there are chances for them to commit suicide also (Karnataka, Bengaluru, 27, DD)

The material consequences of HIV-disclosure were realized in numerous reports of suicide when families discovered MSM’s HIV status:

One kothi I know, was tested positive, he did not reveal this at home but they came to know about it by someone else, and bombarded him with questions such as, “Where did you get this disease from? Are you going to the prostitutes?” Unable to answer the questions he committed suicide by hanging himself the very night. So no MSM will ever reveal his real HIV status (Andhra Pradesh, Visakhapatnam, 28, kothi)

Participants stated that there were few resources for psychological counseling or medical treatment for depression available to MSM in their communities. Sex was mentioned as one coping mechanism for dealing with depression and feelings of sadness:

Some people come there who are mentally depressed and if they find any client there they will indulge in sex and go. This way they can get relief of their depression (Karnataka, Bengaluru, 40, bisexual)

Participants described alcohol use as very widespread among MSM, and there were some indications that those experiencing mental health concerns were more vulnerable to alcohol use, and consequent unsafe sex:

They drink a lot when they undergo any kind of mental discomfort like in their family, when they have no money, any kind of discrimination. When they are drunk they get indulged in unsafe sex. It can be with MSM, kothi or any other clients. They will not inquire and will have sex for money (Karnataka, Tumkur, 21, kothi)

Those infected with HIV were also seen as particularly at risk for alcohol use to cope with the distress of the infection.

Quantitative Results

Demographics and Risk Behaviors

Median age of the 11,992 men was 25 years [interquartile range (IQR) 21–32 years] (Table 2). 45.0 % self-identified as panthi, 14.0 % as kothi, and 18.0 % as double deckers (DDs); 15.2 % self-identified as bisexual, 5.9 % as MSM, and 1.8 % as gay. 35.3 % were currently married to a woman or living with a partner. Half (50.3 %) of the respondents reported unprotected anal intercourse with a man in the prior 6 months. Few had injected illicit drugs in the prior 6 months (0.8 %); however, 34.5 % had evidence of harmful or hazardous alcohol use, and 15.3 % were alcohol dependent. More than half (58.0 %) had disclosed being an MSM to someone though only 5.9 % disclosed to their spouse and/or other family members. Of those ever married, 3.9 % reported disclosing to their wife. Most were HIV uninfected (93.0 %); of those HIV-infected, 35.2 % were aware of their HIV-status. See Supplementary Table 1 for unweighted estimates.

Table 2.

Characteristics by depression status among 11,992 men who have sex with men in 12 Indian cities

No/mild depressiona (N = 10,388) Depressiona (N = 1604) Total (N = 11992)
Region/State, n (row %)
  Andhra Pradesh 2728 (93.7) 270 (6.3) 2998
  Karnataka 2754 (93.3) 244 (6.7) 2998
  Tamil Nadu 2295 (83.1) 706 (16.9) 3001
  Central/North 2611 (87.1) 384 (12.9) 2995
Median age (IQR) 25 (21–32) 27 (22–34) 25 (21–32)
Marital status, n (%)
  Never married 6078 (61.5) 758 (48.5) 6836 (60.1)
  Currently married/living with partner 3931 (34.4) 706 (42.7) 4637 (35.3)
  Widowed/divorced/other 379 (4.1) 137 (8.9) 516 (4.6)
Sexual identity, n (%)
  Panthi 3470 (45.6) 461 (40.5) 3931 (45.0)
  Kothi 2252 (12.9) 562 (23.3) 2814 (14.0)
  Double deckers (DD) 2401 (17.8) 396 (19.6) 2797 (18.0)
  Gay 179 (1.6) 17 (3.4) 196 (1.8)
  MSM 698 (6.3) 30 (2.6) 728 (5.9)
  Bisexual 1388 (15.8) 135 (10.6) 1523 (15.2)
Education, n (%)
  Primary school or less 2285 (20.8) 376 (22.3) 2661 (21.0)
  Secondary school 4478 (44.8) 726 (49.1) 5204 (45.3)
  High school and above 3625 (34.4) 499 (28.6) 4124 (33.8)
Employment, n (%)
  Monthly/weekly wages 5102 (50.2) 792 (52.1) 5894 (50.4)
  Daily/seasonal wages 3640 (29.5) 605 (33.1) 4245 (29.9)
  Unemployed 396 (4.0) 67 (3.4) 463 (4.0)
  Other (student or retired) 1250 (16.3) 137 (11.4) 1387 (15.8)
  Median monthly income (IQR) (Indian rupees) 6000 (3000–8000) 6000 (3000–8000) 6000 (3000–8000)
Disclosure of being MSM, n (%)
  No 4192 (43.6) 457 (28.9) 4649 (42.0)
  Disclosure to spouse/family 804 (5.2) 264 (11.4) 1068 (5.9)
  Disclosure to others but not to spouse/family 5392 (51.1) 880 (59.8) 6272 (52.1)
HIV status awareness and disclosure, n (%)
  Negative 9540 (94.1) 1307 (83.7) 10847 (93.0)
  Known positive, undisclosed status 63 (0.5) 25 (1.5) 88 (0.6)
  Known positive, disclosed status 259 (1.3) 155 (6.6) 414 (1.9)
  Unknown positive 526 (4.1) 117 (8.3) 643 (4.5)
Sex work in prior 6 months, n (%)
  No 7896 (85.2) 955 (72.3) 8851 (83.8)
  Yes 2468 (14.8) 633 (27.7) 3101 (16.2)
Unprotected anal sex in prior 6 months, n (%)
  No 4154 (42.2) 498 (27.9) 4652 (40.7)
  Yes 5667 (48.9) 980 (62.0) 6647 (50.3)
  No anal sex in prior 6 months 567 (8.9) 123 (10.1) 690 (9.0)
Median number of male partners in prior 6 months (IQR) 1 (1–2) 1 (1–2) 1 (1–2)
Injection drug use in prior 6 months, n (%)
  No 10279 (99.3) 1557 (97.9) 11836 (99.2)
  Yes 101 (0.7) 41 (2.1) 142 (0.8)
Any drug use in prior 6 months, n (%)
  No 7942 (84.5) 1284 (82.5) 9226 (84.3)
  Yes 2441 (15.5) 317 (17.5) 2758 (15.7)
Alcohol use and dependence, n (%)
  None/mild 6393 (67.0) 783 (54.1) 7176 (65.6)
  Harmful/hazardous 2211 (19.3) 259 (18.2) 2470 (19.2)
  Alcohol dependence 1784 (13.7) 559 (27.7) 2343 (15.3)
Alcohol use before sex in prior 6 months, n (%)
  No 4406 (47.3) 532 (38.4) 4938 (46.3)
  Yes 4413 (32.5) 778 (43.7) 5191 (33.7)
  No sex in prior 6 months 1565 (20.2) 284 (17.9) 1849 (20.0)
Median social support scoreb (IQR) 6 (2–11) 7 (4–11) 6 (2–11)
Median composite stigma scorec (IQR) 4 (2–6) 7 (4–11) 4 (2–7)
Ever forced sex, n (%)
  No 7821 (83.6) 856 (62.5) 8677 (81.3)
  Yes 2509 (16.4) 735 (37.5) 3244 (18.7)
Adult intimate partner violence, n (%)
  No 8960 (91.9) 1060 (74.5) 10020 (90.0)
  Yes 1402 (8.1) 535 (25.5) 1937 (10.0)

Percentages and median (IQR) are presented as RDS-II weighted. Percentages are column percentages, unless otherwise noted

a

No or mild depression defined by a score of 9 or less on the PHQ-9 depression scale, depression defined as a score of 10 or more

b

Social support score ranged from 0 to 20 with higher scores reflecting more social support

c

Composite stigma score was estimated by averaging stigma scores from 4 scales: vicarious stigma, enacted stigma, felt normative stigma, and internalized stigma; scores ranged from 0 to 20 with higher scores reflecting more stigma

Prevalence of Depression

Overall prevalence of depression was 11.0 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 10.6–11.2 %]; 7.7 % had moderate, 2.2 % moderately severe, and 1.1 % severe depression. The prevalence of depression differed by sexual identity; 18.1 % of kothis, 12.0 % of DDs, and 9.8 % of panthis were depressed. Severe depression was most common among kothis (2.2 %) and DDs (1.3 %). Depression varied considerably across regions/states and cities. Tamil Nadu had the highest prevalence of depression (16.9 %) with two of its cities, Coimbatore and Madurai at 23.7, and 20.1 %, respectively, while Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka both had approximately 6 % prevalence. (Table 2; Fig. 1). Suicidal ideation among those with depression was common; 33.9 % had frequent thoughts (i.e., more than half the days in the prior 2 weeks) of being better off dead or of hurting themselves. Among depressed men who were aware of their HIV status, 55.6 % had frequent suicidal thoughts and 32.3 % of those depressed who had disclosed their MSM behavior had frequent suicidal thoughts.

Correlates of Depression

In univariable regression analysis, older age, being married or widowed/divorced, recent sex work, unprotected anal sex in the prior 6 months, more male sex partners, alcohol dependence, alcohol use before sex, and recent injection drug use were associated with higher odds of depression (Table 3). Men who identified as kothi, reported disclosure of being an MSM to spouse/family or others, and those who experienced forced sex and intimate partner violence had more than two times higher odds of depression. Those reporting more MSM-related stigma were 1.3 times more likely to be depressed. MSM who were aware of their HIV-positive status and had disclosed their status to someone had 3.8 times higher odds of depression compared to HIV-uninfected men.

Table 3.

Correlates of depressiona among 11,997 men who have sex with men in 12 Indian citiesb

Unadjusted
Adjusted
Odds
ratio
95 % Confidence
interval
Odds
Ratio
95 % Confidence
interval
Age (per 10 years) 1.27 1.06, 1.52
Marital status
  Never married REF
  Currently married/living with partner 1.39 1.05, 1.84
  Widowed/divorced/other 1.65 1.05, 2.57
Sexual identity
  Panthi REF REF
  Kothi 2.16 1.56, 2.98 1.91 1.42, 2.56
  Double Deckers (DD) 1.27 0.77, 2.10 1.22 0.73, 2.03
  Gay 1.57 0.40, 6.17 1.67 0.42, 6.58
  MSM 0.63 0.30, 1.33 0.65 0.35, 1.19
  Bisexual 1.26 0.87, 1.84 1.23 0.88, 1.71
Disclosure of being MSM
  No REF REF
  Disclosure to spouse/family 3.56 2.26, 5.60 2.43 1.56, 3.78
  Disclosure to others but not to spouse/family 1.87 1.11, 3.15 1.67 1.01, 2.75
HIV status awareness and disclosure
  Negative REF REF
  Known positive, undisclosed status 3.08 1.86, 5.12 3.83 1.26, 11.6
  Known positive, disclosed status 3.77 3.01, 4.72 5.64 2.76, 11.6
  Unknown positive 1.61 1.29, 2.01 1.36 0.90, 2.08
Sex work in prior 6 months 2.20 1.36, 3.55
Number of male sex partners in prior 6 months (per 5 partner
increase)
1.03 1.01, 1.05
Unprotected anal sex in prior 6 months
  No REF
  Yes 1.65 1.01, 2.68
  No anal sex in prior 6 months 1.55 0.96, 2.51
Alcohol use and dependence (AUDIT)
  None/mild REF REF
  Harmful/hazardous 1.18 0.94, 1.47 1.35 1.09, 1.68
  Alcohol dependence 2.33 1.91, 2.85 2.73 2.16, 3.45
Alcohol use before sex in prior 6 months 1.61 1.02, 2.52
Injection drug use in prior 6 months 2.75 1.86, 4.08 2.03 1.05, 3.91
Social support (per 1 point increase) 1.03 0.97, 1.10
Composite stigma (per 1 point increase) 1.30 1.22, 1.38
Ever forced sex 2.86 1.86, 4.41
Adult intimate partner violence 3.04 1.79, 5.16
a

Depression defined as a score of 10 or more on the PHQ-9

b

With scaled RDS-II weights

In multivariable analysis, age, marital status, unprotected anal sex in the prior 6 months, number of male sex partners, and alcohol use before sex did not remain associated with depression (Table 3). Kothis (compared to panthis) had nearly two-fold the odds of depression (adjusted odds ratio 1.91, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.42–2.56). Disclosure of MSM-status to non-family members carried 1.7-times higher odds of depression (95 % CI 1.01–2.75), while disclosure to a spouse or other family member was associated with 2.4-times higher odds (95 % CI 1.56–3.78), compared to those who have not disclosed to anyone. Those aware of their HIV-positive status but did not disclose it had almost 4-times higher odds (95 % CI 1.26–11.6), and those who disclosed it had nearly six-times higher odds of depression compared to HIV-uninfected men (95 % CI 2.76–11.6). Recent injection drug use and alcohol use were independently associated with depression after adjustment for other correlates. Sex work in the prior 6 months, stigma, a history of forced sex and intimate partner violence were significantly associated with sexual identity, with both kothis and DDs at increased odds of reporting these experiences as compared to panthis (results not shown). Therefore, these factors are considered mediators of the sexual identity-depression relationship and were excluded from the final multivariable model.

Discussion

In this large, multi-site study of MSM in India the prevalence of depression was 11 %. Consistent with previous research that has found higher prevalence of depression among MSM compared with the general population, these findings are higher than the 9 % lifetime prevalence, and much higher than the 4.5 % 12-month prevalence of major depressive episode in the general population in India reported in the World Mental Health Survey using the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) [59]. The difference between the findings of our studies is even more pronounced when we consider only men in the World Mental Health Survey, since they had nearly half the odds of depression compared with women [59]. The prevalence of depression in our study is significantly lower compared with previous estimates of depression prevalence between 29 and 55 % among MSM in India [7, 15, 20]. However, we found substantial differences in the likelihood of depression across study sites, with cities in Tamil Nadu and the Central/North region having a higher prevalence of depression, which were more similar to the lower end of these estimates. Moreover, there were additional differences in the prevalence of depression among specific groups of MSM within our sample. Therefore, geographic variation, along with the specific composition of smaller, usually convenience- or clinic-based samples, may have produced these differences between our findings and those from prior studies of depression among MSM in India. Our estimates of depression are also lower than those from large studies of MSM in other settings, such as in the U.S. (47.3 %) [54] and in Latin America (28 %) [60]. These cross-national differences may partly reflect broader trends in the prevalence of depression across settings in the general population [59], as well as more specific differences between MSM populations. More rigorous comparison, however, is hindered by different sampling strategies and choices in the instruments used to measure depression.

One-third (33.9 %) of depressed MSM reported frequent suicidal thoughts. Moreover, suicidal thoughts and reports of suicide constituted a prominent theme in the qualitative findings. Previous studies have documented high prevalence of suicide in India in the general population, especially among men [61], and markedly high levels (45 %) of suicidality among MSM in particular [17]. Similarly, in other settings MSM have been identified at elevated risk for suicidality [62, 63]. While our study only assessed suicidal ideation instead of a full assessment of suicidality, our data point to a high vulnerability of MSM to suicide in India and the importance of a fuller investigation of suicidality among MSM in India and the potential use of the PHQ-9 as a preliminary indicator for further screening and prevention efforts.

Overall, our findings are consistent with the minority stress model that links psychological stress associated with societal homophobia with mental health disorders [25], and draws attention to the importance of considering depression, along with other co-occurring psychosocial factors, in relation to HIV. Qualitative results provided insight into the specific social dynamics that may contribute to depression among MSM in the Indian context. These findings highlighted the negative psychological effects of persistent stigmatization, harassment, and violence; the specific vulnerabilities of more visibly identifiable groups of MSM; and the related pressure to conceal same-sex sexual behavior; and the devastating impact of disclosure of same-sex sexual behavior and HIV-positive status.

Our study also identified a number of important differences in the prevalence of depression by sexual identity, disclosure of MSM- and HIV-positive status, and substance use. First, kothi-identifying MSM were almost twice as likely to be depressed than panthis. Previous research has found that kothis experience high levels of stigmatization, discrimination, and violence in their families and communities, partly due to their visible femininity, and have few employment options beyond sex work [9, 10, 24, 35]. Our results similarly found an association with kothi-identity and stigma, forced sex, intimate partner violence and recent sex work. Therefore, it is likely these experiences are located in the pathway between sexual identity, specifically kothi-identity, and depression. Qualitative findings emphasized kothis’ and some feminine DDs’ heightened vulnerability to stigmatization and harassment based on their greater visibility due to their feminine gender expression. In prior research gender non-conformity stigma has been specifically linked to higher rates of depression [7]. Our findings highlight the connections between kothi sexual identity, gender non-conformity, and depression, which contribute to structural vulnerabilities to HIV [7, 9, 10, 24].

Second, disclosure of being an MSM to a non-family member was associated with greater likelihood of depression, and an even higher likelihood when disclosed to a spouse or other family member, compared with undisclosed MSM. Similarly, while all HIV-positive MSM aware of their infection were at elevated odds of depression compared to HIV-uninfected peers, disclosure of their infection was associated with nearly six-fold odds of depression versus four-times greater odds of depression for those who remained undisclosed. Due to the cross-sectional nature of our study, we cannot determine the direction of these associations. Qualitative findings, however, identified pervasive fear and severe consequences of disclosure of being an MSM and being HIV-positive, including community-, and especially family-level rejection, which could lead to depression. An HIV-positive status itself could make MSM vulnerable to disclosure of their same-sex sexual behavior. The prominence of suicidal thoughts and suicide itself as potential consequences of disclosure in the qualitative data is particularly notable. These findings suggest that depression may be, at least in part, a consequence of disclosure. Although disclosure of sexual orientation and HIV-positive status could improve access to social support, these potential benefits may be outweighed by severe stigmatization of homosexuality and HIV in some settings [54]. In India, family rejection may result in the withdrawal of social and material support, and social exclusion equivalent to a form of social death [64]. The relatively high prevalence of suicidal ideation in our sample, as well as previous research that found high levels of suicidality among MSM in Mumbai [17] suggest the need for further studies to evaluate this potential association between disclosure, depression, and suicidality, and indicate the importance of suicide prevention and family incorporation as part of mental health services. Since the possibility of disclosure could also act as a deterrent to HIV testing in order to avoid the potential consequences of a positive diagnosis, integrating mental health services and outreach support should be ideally incorporated into the entire HIV care continuum.

Finally, quantitative results highlight the association of injection drug and alcohol use with increased likelihood of depression. Although relatively few MSM injected drugs, this population merits additional attention, especially in light of recent evidence from Delhi [65], which found that one-third of male PWID sampled engaged in MSM behavior and also had significant psychosocial vulnerabilities. While our qualitative results did not yield insight into injection drug use, perhaps due to the relatively low overall prevalence of injection among MSM, they support pervasive alcohol use and its role in managing psychological stress associated with being MSM. Other studies among MSM have also highlighted the diverse uses of alcohol and its role in high-risk sexual behavior [14, 18, 20, 21, 66]. Since substance use is both a cause and consequence of poor psychosocial health, including depression, these associations are difficult to disentangle [17, 65]. Nevertheless, our findings support the expansion of substance use services to MSM.

Strengths and Limitations

This large, multi-site study found higher overall prevalence of depression (11 %) among MSM across diverse geographic regions and sexual identities in India compared with the general population, but found lower prevalence of depression compared with previous estimates from smaller studies of Indian MSM. Our study identified substantial differences in the likelihood of depression across study sites and specific groups of MSM, supplemented by qualitative insights about the sociocultural context that contributes to the vulnerability of MSM to depression in India. Previous research on depression among MSM in India has employed a variety of different instruments to assess depression. Although consistent with previous literature, the PHQ-9 cutoff used to ascertain depression in our study excluded those with mild depression, and therefore may result in a conservative estimate of the burden of depression. Clinical interviews were not available to confirm the presence of depression. At the same time, elevated risks of depression among certain MSM groups in our findings may explain prior reports of higher depression prevalence based on smaller convenience and venue-based samples, which may overestimate the depression prevalence by reaching MSM at high risk for depression, particularly more visible kothis [911, 35].

Although a cross-sectional design does not enable us to establish the causal roots of depression or directionality of associations found in our quantitative analysis, this limitation is mitigated by qualitative research insights. Quantitative data on suicidal ideation came from one question within the PHQ-9 instrument, limiting our ability to address suicidality in more detail. A fuller investigation of suicidality, entailing an assessment of suicidal intent, planning, and prior attempts is needed to explore suicidality among MSM and to develop potential suicide prevention services. Additionally, while adjustment for data collected via RDS attempts to produce valid population estimates, we were unable to verify that our sample is representative of the underlying population and its associated characteristics. However, the RDS was efficient in recruiting a more diverse sample of MSM compared to those previously collected by convenience or venue-based sampling. Our study underscores the importance of structural interventions that address stigmatization and discrimination, with attention to gender non-conformity, and integrated mental health services that address suicidality and substance use, and incorporate family members to increase acceptance of MSM and mitigate the impact of family rejection. Since HIV-positive MSM were particularly vulnerable to depression, and lack of support after disclosure may play a role in this dynamic, mental health support services would be particularly important components of community HIV services in high-prevalence settings. Although our study does not provide insight about the causes of geographic disparities in depression, previous historical and ethnographic literature has identified substantial variation in sexual identities and the treatment of MSM in different cities and regions of India [2730, 34]. The causes of geographic disparities should be investigated in future studies, with specific attention to the availability and accessibility of local resources and cultural attitudes towards MSM.

Supplementary Material

1

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by Grants from the National Institutes of Health R01MH89266 and R21MH101059, and the Johns Hopkins Center for AIDS Research (1P30AI094189).

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10461-015-1201-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest No conflict of interest are declared.

References

  • 1.UNAIDS. 2013 Report of the global aids epidemic: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. 2013 [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beyrer C, Baral SD, van Griensven F, et al. Global epidemiology of HIV infection in men who have sex with men. Lancet. 2012;380(9839):367–377. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60821-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.National Institute of Medical Statistics and National AIDS Control Organisation. Technical Report: India HIV Estimates. 2012 [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Thomas B, Mimiaga MJ, Menon S, et al. Unseen and unheard: predictors of sexual risk behavior and HIV infection among men who have sex with men in Chennai, India. AIDS Educ Prev. 2009;21(4):372–383. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2009.21.4.372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Thomas B, Mimiaga MJ, Kumar S, Swaminathan S, Safren SA, Mayer KH. HIV in Indian MSM: reasons for a concentrated epidemic & strategies for prevention. Indian J Med Res. 2011;134(6):920–929. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.92637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thomas B, Mimiaga MJ, Mayer KH, Perry NS, Swaminathan S, Safren SA. The influence of stigma on HIV risk behavior among men who have sex with men in Chennai, India. AIDS Care. 2012;24(11):1401–1406. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.672717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Logie CH, Newman PA, Chakrapani V, Shunmugam M. Adapting the minority stress model: associations between gender nonconformity stigma, HIV-related stigma and depression among men who have sex with men in South India. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(8):1261–1268. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mimiaga MJ, Closson EF, Thomas B, et al. Garnering an in-depth understanding of men who have sex with men in Chennai, India: a qualitative analysis of sexual minority status and psychological distress. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44(7):2077–2086. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0369-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chakrapani V, Newman PA, Shunmugam M, McLuckie A, Melwin F. Structural violence against Kothi-identified men who have sex with men in Chennai, India: a qualitative investigation. AIDS Educ Prev. 2007;19(4):346–364. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2007.19.4.346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chakrapani V, Newman PA, Shunmugam M. Secondary HIV prevention among kothi-identified MSM in Chennai, India. Cult Health Sex. 2008;10(4):313–327. doi: 10.1080/13691050701816714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chakrapani V, Newman PA, Shunmugam M, Dubrow R. Barriers to free antiretroviral treatment access among kothi-identified men who have sex with men and aravanis (transgender women) in Chennai, India. AIDS Care. 2011;23(12):1687–1694. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2011.582076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Boyce P, Chakrapani V, Dhanikachalam D. Hard-to-reach men who have sex with men in India, recommendations for HIV prevention. 2011 [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Closson EF, Sivasubramanian M, Mayer KH, et al. The other side of the bridge: exploring the sexual relationships of men who have sex with men and their female partners in Mumbai, India. Cult Health Sex. 2014;16(7):780–791. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2014.911960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Go VF, Srikrishnan AK, Sivaram S, et al. High HIV prevalence and risk behaviors in men who have sex with men in Chennai, India. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35(3):314–319. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200403010-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Safren SA, Thomas BE, Mimiaga MJ, et al. Depressive symptoms and human immunodeficiency virus risk behavior among men who have sex with men in Chennai, India. Psychol Health Med. 2009;14(6):705–715. doi: 10.1080/13548500903334754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Deb S, Dutta S, Dasgupta A, Roy S. Hidden psychiatric morbidities and general health status among men who have sex with men and other clients of a sexually transmitted disease clinic of Kolkata: a comparative study. Indian J Community Med. 2010;35(1):193. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.62566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sivasubramanian M, Mimiaga MJ, Mayer KH, et al. Suicidality, clinical depression, and anxiety disorders are highly prevalent in men who have sex with men in Mumbai, India: findings from a community-recruited sample. Psychol Health Med. 2011;16(4):450–462. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2011.554645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mimiaga MJ, Thomas B, Mayer KH, et al. Alcohol use and HIV sexual risk among MSM in Chennai. India. Int J STD AIDS. 2011;22(3):121–125. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2009.009059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Thomas B, Mimiaga MJ, Mayer KH, et al. Ensuring it works: a community-based approach to HIV prevention intervention development for men who have sex with men in Chennai. India. AIDS Educ Prev. 2012;24(6):483–499. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2012.24.6.483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mimiaga MJ, Biello KB, Sivasubramanian M, Mayer KH, Anand VR, Safren SA. Psychosocial risk factors for HIV sexual risk among Indian men who have sex with men. AIDS Care. 2013;25(9):1109–1113. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.749340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yadav D, Chakrapani V, Goswami P, et al. Association between alcohol use and HIV-related sexual risk behaviors among men who have sex with men (MSM): findings from a multi-site bio-behavioral survey in India. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(7):1330–1338. doi: 10.1007/s10461-014-0699-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Prajapati AC, Parikh S, Bala DV. A study of mental health status of men who have sex with men in Ahmedabad city. Indian J Psychiatry. 2014;56(2):161–164. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.130498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Thomas B, Mimiaga MJ, Mayer KH, et al. HIV prevention interventions in Chennai, India: are men who have sex with men being reached? AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2009;23(11):981–986. doi: 10.1089/apc.2009.0092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chakrapani V, Boyce P, Newman PA, Row Kavi A. Contextual influences on condom use among men who have sex with men in India: subjectivities, practices and risks. Cult Health Sex. 2013;15(8):938–951. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2013.798032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Meyer IH. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull. 2003;129(5):674–697. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Safren SA, Thomas BE, Mayer KH, et al. A pilot RCT of an intervention to reduce HIV sexual risk and increase self-acceptance among MSM in Chennai, India. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(10):1904–1912. doi: 10.1007/s10461-014-0773-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Boyce P. ‘Conceiving kothis’: men who have sex with men in India and the cultural subject of HIV prevention. Med Anthropol. 2007;26(2):175–203. doi: 10.1080/01459740701285582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dutta A. An epistemology of collusion: hijras, kothis and the historical (dis) continuity of gender/sexual identities in eastern India. Gend Hist. 2012;24(3):825–849. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Reddy G. Geographies of contagion: hijras, Kothis, and the politics of sexual marginality in Hyderabad. Anthropol Med. 2005;12(3):255–270. doi: 10.1080/13648470500291410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hall K. Intertextual Sexuality. J Linguist Anthropol. 2005;15(1):125–144. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kumta S, Lurie M, Weitzen S, et al. Bisexuality, sexual risk taking, and HIV prevalence among men who have sex with men accessing voluntary counseling and testing services in Mumbai, India. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;53(2):227–233. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181c354d8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Phillips AE, Lowndes CM, Boily MC, et al. Men who have sex with men and women in Bangalore, South India, and potential impact on the HIV epidemic. Sex Transm Infect. 2010;86(3):187–192. doi: 10.1136/sti.2009.038216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Solomon SS, Srikrishnan AK, Sifakis F, et al. The emerging HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men in Tamil Nadu, India: geographic diffusion and bisexual concurrency. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(5):1001–1010. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9711-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cohen L. The Kothi wars: AIDS cosmopolitanism and the morality of classification. In: Adams V, Piggs SL, editors. Sex in development: science, sexuality, and morality in global perspective. Durham: Duke; 2005. pp. 269–304. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Newman P, Chakrapani V, Cook C, Shunmugam M, Kakinami L. Correlates of paid sex among men who have sex with men in Chennai, India. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;84(6):434–438. doi: 10.1136/sti.2008.031484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shaw SY, Lorway RR, Deering KN, et al. Factors associated with sexual violence against men who have sex with men and transgendered individuals in Karnataka, India. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e31705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Narayanan P, Das A, Prabhakar P, et al. Self-Identity, Sexual Practices and Sexually Transmitted Infections among High-Risk Men who Have Sex with Men Attending Clinics in Urban India. J AIDS Clinic Res S. 2012;S1:S011. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Thomas B, Mimiaga MJ, Mayer KH, Perry NS, Swaminathan S, Safren SA. The influence of stigma on HIV risk behavior among men who have sex with men in Chennai, India. AIDS Care. 2012;24(11):1401–1406. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.672717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Solomon SS, Lucas GM, Celentano DD, Sifakis F, Mehta SH. Beyond surveillance: a role for respondent-driven sampling in implementation science. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(2):260–267. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Walnut Creek: Rowman Altamira; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Solomon SS, Mehta SH, Srikrishnan AK, et al. High HIV prevalence and incidence among MSM across 12 cities in India. AIDS. 2015;29(6):723–731. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Volz E, Heckathorn DD. Probability based estimation theory for respondent driven sampling. J Off Stat. 2008;24(1):79–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.White RG, Lansky A, Goel S, et al. Respondent driven sampling- where we are and where should we be going? Sex Transm Infect. 2012;88(6):397–399. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2012-050703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–613. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Walker J, Hansen CH, Hodges L, et al. Screening for suicidality in cancer patients using Item 9 of the nine-item patient health questionnaire; does the item score predict who requires further assessment? Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010;32(2):218–220. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2009.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Uebelacker LA, German NM, Gaudiano BA, Miller IW. Patient health questionnaire depression scale as a suicide screening instrument in depressed primary care patients: a cross-sectional study. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2011 doi: 10.4088/PCC.10m01027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kessler RC, Borges G, Walters EE. Prevalence of and risk factors for lifetime suicide attempts in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(7):617–626. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.7.617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Patel V, Araya R, Chowdhary N, et al. Detecting common mental disorders in primary care in India: a comparison of five screening questionnaires. Psychol Med. 2008;38(2):221–228. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707002334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ganguly S, Samanta M, Roy P, Chatterjee S, Kaplan DW, Basu B. Patient health questionnaire-9 as an effective tool for screening of depression among Indian adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(5):546–551. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kochhar P, Rajadhyaksha S, Suvarna V. Translation and validation of brief patient health questionnaire against DSM IV as a tool to diagnose major depressive disorder in Indian patients. J Postgrad Med. 2007;53(2):102. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.32209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Manea L, Gilbody S, McMillan D. Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2012;184(3):E191–E196. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner of India. [Accessed 8 May 2013];2011 Census District Profiles. 2011 http://censusindia.gov.in/Tables_Published/Basic_Data_Sheet.aspx.
  • 54.Mimiaga MJ, O’Cleirigh C, Biello KB, et al. The effect of psychosocial syndemic production on 4-year HIV incidence and risk behavior in a large cohort of sexually active men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;68(3):329–336. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mimiaga MJ, Noonan E, Donnell D, et al. Childhood sexual abuse is highly associated with HIV risk-taking behavior and infection among MSM in the EXPLORE study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;51(3):340–348. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181a24b38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Regier DA, Farmer ME, Rae DS, et al. Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug abuse: results from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) study. JAMA. 1990;264(19):2511–2518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Houston E, McKirnan DJ. Intimate partner abuse among gay and bisexual men: risk correlates and health outcomes. J Urban Health. 2007;84(5):681–690. doi: 10.1007/s11524-007-9188-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Stall R, Mills TC, Williamson J, et al. Association of co-occurring psychosocial health problems and increased vulnerability to HIV/AIDS among urban men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(6):939–942. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.6.939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bromet E, Andrade LH, Hwang I, et al. Cross-national epidemiology of DSM-IV major depressive episode. BMC Med. 2011;9(1):90. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Mimiaga MJ, Biello KB, Robertson AM, et al. High prevalence of multiple syndemic conditions associated with sexual risk behavior and HIV infection among a large sample of Spanish-and Portuguese-speaking men who have sex with men in Latin America. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44(7):1869–1878. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0488-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Patel V, Ramasundarahettige C, Vijayakumar L, et al. Suicide mortality in India: a nationally representative survey. Lancet. 2012;379(9834):2343–2351. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60606-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Guadamuz T, McCarthy K, Wimonsate W, et al. Psychosocial health conditions and HIV prevalence and incidence in a cohort of men who have sex with men in Bangkok, Thailand: evidence of a syndemic effect. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(11):2089–2096. doi: 10.1007/s10461-014-0826-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Parker RD, Lõhmus L, Valk A, Mangine C, Rüütel K. Outcomes associated with anxiety and depression among men who have sex with men in Estonia. J Affect Disord. 2015;183:205–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Thompson LH, Khan S, du Plessis E, et al. Beyond internalised stigma: daily moralities and subjectivity among self-identified kothis in Karnataka, South India. Cult Health Sex. 2013;15(10):1237–1251. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2013.818714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Armstrong G, Jorm AF, Samson L, Joubert L, Singh S, Kermode M. Male-to-male sex among men who inject drugs in Delhi, India: overlapping HIV risk behaviours. Int J Drug Policy. 2014;26(4):404–411. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rodriguez DC, Krishnan AK, Kumarasamy N, et al. Two sides of the same story: alcohol use and HIV risk taking in South India. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(Suppl 1):S136–S146. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9722-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES