Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 16;26(2):224–231. doi: 10.1038/jes.2015.77

Table 6. The effect of smoking in linear Cox models with unlagged cumulative exposure to Cr(VI).

Model 1: all workers (n=714) β (Potency factor)a
Smoking Deviance MLE 95% CI
Not controlled 1252.26 0.649 (0.279, 1.367)
Controlled 1236.45 0.581 (0.222, 1.322)
Comparison groups
RR
Non-smokers vs workers with unknown smoking status 0.39
Smokers vs workers with unknown smoking status 1.94
Smokers vs non-smokers 5.01
Model 2: workers with known smoking history (n=200)
β (Potency factor)a
Smoking Deviance MLE 95% CI
Not controlled 504.28 0.434 (0.0913, 1.541)
Controlled 488.05 0.535 (0.125, 1.922)
Comparison groups
RR
Smokers vs non-smokers 6.05

Abbreviations: MLE, maximum likelihood estimate; RR, relative risk for lung cancer.

a

The unit of β for the relative risk is (mg/m3-years)−1.