Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 17;6:21130. doi: 10.1038/srep21130

Table 4. Classification results of PLS-DA and RC-PLS-DA models.

Models Type Number of variables Calibration
Prediction
No.a Correct CA/%b No. a Correct CA/% b
PLS-DA Intact 396 34 34 100 17 16 94.12
Cracked 396 34 34 100 17 17 100
All 396 68 68 100 34 33 97.06
RC-PLS-DA Intact 18 34 31 91.18 17 17 100
Cracked 18 34 34 100 17 13 76.47
All 18 68 65 95.59 34 30 88.24

a: Number of samples; b: Classification accuracy.