Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 15;4:e1677. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1677

Table 2. Summary of post hoc analyses for Experiments 1 and 2.

Per cent happiness range Mean d′ gain and SEM Paired t test
Experiment 1 Incongruent [10%–20%] 2.41 ± 0.65 t = 3.80, df = 9, p = 0.004, d = 2.53
[20%–30%] 2.57 ± 0.73 t = 3.94, df = 9, p = 0.003, d = 2.62
Congruent [10%–20%] 2.77 ± 0.75 t = 4.11, df = 9, p = 0.003, d = 2.76
[20%–30%] 2.58 ± 0.81 t = 3.62, df = 9, p = 0.005, d = 2.23
Experiment 2 Incongruent [10%–20%] 3.37 ± 0.82 t = 4.51, df = 9, p = 0.001, d = 3.00
[20%–30%] 2.15 ± 0.81 t = 2.86, df = 9, p = 0.019, d = 1.90
Congruent [10%–20%] 3.47 ± 0.72 t = 5.32, df = 9, p < 0.001, d = 3.55
[20%–30%] 2.06 ± 0.77 t = 3.09, df = 9, p = 0.013, d = 2.06