Table 6.

Simulation results corresponding to h₀₂(·) under different censoring rates and sample sizes: the deviance information criterion (DIC), the mean squared errors (MSE) of $\widehat{\beta }$ and $\widehat{\gamma }$ and the estimated integrated area under the curve (iAUC), and their standard errors in parentheses calculated from the 100 simulated data sets. The Gibbs sampler was run for 20,000 iterations with 5,000 burn-in iterations for each simulated data set.

sample size	censoring rate		${\mathrm{MSE}}_{\widehat{\beta }}$	${\mathrm{MSE}}_{\widehat{\gamma }}$	iAUC	DIC
200	0.3	FPCA	0.112 (0.009)	0.618 (0.018)	0.934 (0.001)	128.21 (3.57)
		PCA	0.112 (0.010)	0.854 (0.021)	0.933 (0.001)	129.02 (3.66)
	0.5	FPCA	0.183 (0.017)	0.698 (0.023)	0.933 (0.002)	−15.26 (3.37)
		PCA	0.189 (0.018)	0.913 (0.023)	0.932 (0.002)	−13.70 (3.38)
500	0.3	FPCA	0.048 (0.003)	0.453 (0.012)	0.931 (0.001)	306.94 (4.46)
		PCA	0.049 (0.005)	0.586 (0.015)	0.930 (0.001)	308.62 (4.49)
	0.5	FPCA	0.054 (0.004)	0.457 (0.013)	0.927 (0.001)	−69.55 (4.50)
		PCA	0.054 (0.004)	0.611 (0.016)	0.926 (0.001)	−68.00 (4.54)