Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec;24(4):549–556. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJA-15-0038

Table 4.

The associations between various predictors and hearing handicap sum-score.

Predictor Model 1 (unadjusted effect) Model 2 (adjusted effect) a
unstandardized b, [95% CI], p unstandardized b, [95% CI], p
Time of onset of hearing loss b −0.473, [−0.633, −0.313], <.001 −0.012, [−0.169, 0.145], .882
Adult hearing threshold level in dB −0.038, [−0.042, −0.035], <.001 −0.32, [−0.036, −0.028], <.001
Age (20–56, in years) −0.001, [−0.066, 0.004], .762 −0.002, [−0.008, 0.003], .375
Sex (male = 1, female = 2) 0.088, [0.007, 0.169], .034 0.092, [0.005, 0.179], .037
Education c 0.039, [0.011, 0.067], .007 0.023, [−0.004, 0.050], .097
Income (per 10,000 Norwegian Krone/year) 0.0014, [0.0, 0.0], .495 −0.0015, [0.0, 0.0], .587
Hearing aid use (no = 0, yes = 1) −1.144, [−1.280, −1.008], <.001 −0.496, [−0.647, −0.345], <.001

Note. For easier interpretation of the effect sizes, the hearing handicap sum-score scale (a high sum-score indicates good self-perceived hearing ability) is Z-transformed so that the observed effects correspond to the change in standard deviation of the sum-score scale. CI = confidence interval.

a

The effects are adjusted for the effects of all the other predictors.

b

Childhood versus adulthood.

c

Scale 0–9, representing increasing years of education.