Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct;4(1):32–42.

Table 7.

Summary of the BlastP analysis (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) of RpoS

Seq. Subject ID Length Max score Total score Query cover
(%)
E value Identities
number (%)
Positive
number (%)
Gap
number (%)
1 1L9U_H 332 204 204 72% 6e-62 112.2 (46%) 163.2 (66%) 5.2 (2%)
2 1L9Z_H 438 204 204 72% 7e-61 112.2 (46%) 163.2 (66%) 5.2 (2%)
3 1IW7_F 423 202 202 72% 2e-60 110.2 (45%) 163.2 (66%) 5.2 (2%)
4 3DXJ_F 423 202 202 72% 2e-60 110.2 (45%) 163.2 (66%) 5.2 (2%)
5 4G7H_F 443 202 202 72% 5e-60 110.2 (45%) 163.2 (66%) 5.2 (2%)
6 4LJZ_F 522 201 201 78% 6e-59 107.3(40%) 166.3(62%) 7.3(2%)
7 3IYD_F 613 201 201 78% 2e-58 107.3(40%) 166.3(62%) 7.3(2%)
8 4IGC_X 613 201 201 78% 2e-58 107.3(40%) 166.3(62%) 7.3(2%)
9 4JKR_F 628 201 201 78% 2e-58 107.3(40%) 166.3(62%) 7.3(2%)
10 1KU2_A 241 155 155 41% 2e-44 78.1 (56%) 104.1 (74%) 2.1(1%)