Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec;28(6):574ā€“583. doi: 10.1177/1971400915611916

Table 1.

Diagnosing contrast-enhancing lesions: Summary of literature results.

Study (n) Group (n) Mean rCBV Mean PSR (%) rCBV threshold (Sn%; Sp%) PSR threshold (%) (Sn%; Sp%) Comments Level of evidenceb
Hartmann 2003 (24) GBM (12) 4.99a NA Not provided NA Retrospective. No cutoffs, sensitivities or specificities provided. 4
PCNSL (12) 1.29a NA
Cha 2007 (43) GBM (27) NA 80.9a NA 66 (67; 100) Retrospective. Some cases not histopathologically confirmed. 4
MET (16) NA 62.5a
Liao 2009 (20) HGG (11) 4.86a 93a Not provided Not provided Retrospective. No cutoffs, sensitivities or specificities provided. 4
PCNSL (9) 1.72a 175a
Mangla 2011 (66) GBM (22) 4.72a 87a Not provided 94 (PCNSL vs. other) (100; 69) 75 (MET vs. other) (100; 83) Retrospective. Some cases not histopathologically confirmed. 4
PCNSL (22) 2.43a 158a
MET (22) 2.93a 55a
Xing 2013 (38) HGG (26) 5.05a 68a 2.56 (96.2; 90) 89 (100; 88.5) Retrospective 4
PCNSL (12) 1.69a 137a
Toh 2013 (35) GBM (20) 5.47a NA 3.01 (90; 93.3) NA Retrospective 4
PCNSL (15) 2.28a NA

apā€‰<ā€‰0.05.

bSee Appendix A.

GBM: glioblastoma; HGG: high-grade glioma; MET: metastasis; NA: not studied; PCNSL: primary central nervous system lymphoma; PSR: percentage of signal intensity recovery; rCBV: relative cerebral blood volume; Sn: sensitivity; Sp: specificity; vs.: versus