Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec;28(6):574–583. doi: 10.1177/1971400915611916

Table 3.

Radiation necrosis versus recurrent HGG: Summary of literature results.

Study (n) Group (n) Mean rCBV Mean PSR (%) rCBV threshold (Sn%; Sp%) PSR threshold (%) (Sn%; Sp%) Comments Level of evidenceb
Di Constanzo 2008 (29) GBM (21) 1.73a NA Not provided NA Retrospective. Significant variation in treatment history and regimes. Some patients on steroids. Not all cases histopathologically confirmed. 4
RN (8) 0.86a NA
Hu 2009 (40) HGG (24) 0.55 - 4.64 NA 0.71 (91.7; 100) NA Retrospective. Mean rCBV and P values not provided. Significant variation in radiotherapy dose. 4
RN (16) 0.21 -0.71 NA
Barajas, Chang, Segal 2009 (57) GBM (40) 2.38a 80.2a 1.75 (78.92; 71.58) 87.3 (78.26; 76.19) Retrospective. Not all cases were histopathologically confirmed. 4
RN (17) 0.82a 89.3a
Fink 2012 (40) HGG (30) 3.62a NA 2.08 (86.2; 90) NA Retrospective. Not all cases were histopathologically confirmed. 4
RN (10) 1.31a NA
a

P < 0.05.

bSee Appendix A.

GBM: glioblastoma; HGG: high-grade glioma; MET: metastasis; NA: not studied; PSR: percentage of signal intensity recovery; rCBV: relative cerebral blood volume; RN: radiation necrosis; Sn: sensitivity; Sp: specificity; vs.: versus