Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr;28(2):152–171. doi: 10.1177/1971400915576678

Table 6.

Outcomes.

No. Authors N Recanalization score used % Successful recanalization Duration of follow-up (months) % mRS<2 % mRS=6 % ICH % sICH
 1 Miteff F, et al. 26 TIMI 96.2 3 42.3 19.2 11.5 7.7
 2 Broussalis E, et al. 62 TICI 82.0 3 59.0 8.0 31.0 10.0
 3 Soize S, et al. 36 TICI 77.8 3 61.6 22.2 27.7 8.3
 4 Dorn F, et al. 104 TICI 78.0 1
 5 Kocher M, et al. 50 TICI 94.0 3 60.0 14.0 28.0 6.0
 6 Mohlenbruch M, et al. 25 Mori et al. 88.0 3 60.0 8.0 12.0
 7 Mpotsaris A, et al. 41 TIMI 85.0 3 36.6 22.0 7.3
 8 Costalat V, et al. 50 TICI 88.0 3 54.0 12.0 2.0
 9 Roth C, et al. 40 TICI 95.0 3 60.0 12.5 10.0 2.5
10 Cohen JE, et al. 31 TIMI 90.0 3 77.0 10.0 23.0 3.2
11 Machi P, et al. 56 TICI 89.0 0 46.0 7.1 5.4 1.7
12 Mpotsaris A, et al. 26 TIMI 88.0 3 38.4 7.7
13 Sanak D, et al. 50 TICI 94.0 3 60.0 14.0 28.0 6.0
14 Nogueira RG, et al. 88 TICI 86.0 3 40.0 34.1 41.0 4.0
15 Saver JL, et al. 58 TIMI 61.0 3 58.0 17.0 17.0 2.0
16 Yoon YH, et al. 26 TICI 77.0 3 39.0 8.0 12.0 0.0
17 Mokin M, et al. 101 TIMI 88.0 1 38.0 26.0 23.0 15.0
18 Castano C, et al. 20 TICI 90.0 3 45.0 20.0 30.0 10.0
19 Leker RR, et al. 22 TICI 95.0 3 60.0 20.0 14.0 5.0
20 Roman LS, et al. 60 TICI 73.3 3 45.0 28.3 11.7