Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr;28(2):198–204. doi: 10.1177/1971400915576658

Table 1.

Diagnostic performance of T2 – shine through effect in DWI for detecting response to percutaneous treatments.

n TP TN FP FN AUC % (95% CI) Sensitivity % (95% CI) Specificity % (95% CI) Accuracy % (95% CI) NPV % (95% CI) PPV % (95% CI)
Second month
Study group 77 35 19 4 19 97.1 (94.9–99.4) 65.2 (64.2–66.8) 83.2 (82.2–84.4) 70.1 (69.3–71.4) 50.6 (49.3–51.4) 90.5 (89.3–91.5)
Control group 77 6 39 8 24 96.2 (95.4–97.8) 22.2 (21.5–23.2) 83.4 (82.5–84.7) 58.2 (57.4–59.7) 62.1 (61.1–63.2) 43.4 (42.1–44.5)
Fourth month
Study group 77 41 19 1 16 97.7 (96.1–97.4) 72.3 (71.1–73.4) 95.4 (94.2–95.5) 78.2 (77.2–78.7) 54.2 (53.1–55.6) 98.3 (97.1–99.4)
Control group 77 6 41 7 24 97.4 (96.1–98.4) 22.2 (21.3–23.6) 61.5 (60.2–62.7) 62.3 (61.1–63.9) 63.4 (62.4–64.7) 46.2 (45.3–47.8)
Sixth month
Study group 77 53 19 4 1 98.7 (97.3–99.4) 98.1 (97.2–99.2) 83.2 (82.2–84.5) 94.6 (93.7–94.2) 95.7 (94.1–96.7) 93.6 (92.1–94.8)
Control group 77 2 65 3 7 98.5 (97.1–99.3) 22.4 (21.5–23.8) 96.5 (95.1–97.7) 87.7 (86.1–88.9) 91.2 (90.2–92.8) 42.6 (41.2–43.9)

TP: true positive; TN: true negative; FP: false positive; FN: false negative; AUC: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CI: confidence interval; NPV: negative predictive value; PPV: positive predictive value.