Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May 13;213(2):191.e1–191.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.012

TABLE 2.

Comparison of intramuscular ECM collagen content between virgin, MP, LP, 4 wks PP and 12 wks PP groups

Group Coccygeus Iliocaudalis Pubocaudalis Tibialis anterior
Virgin 3.11 ± 0.47 2.87 ± 0.27 3.46 ± 0.52 6.87 ± 0.37
MP 5.87 ± 0.66 3.18 ± 0.11 4.90 ± 0.53
LP 7.45 ± 0.65 4.34 ± 0.12 6.05 ± 0.62 7.02 ± 0.54
4 wks PP 6.67 ± 0.68 2.90 ± 0.22 4.14 ± 0.32
12 wks PP 6.37 ± 0.55 2.86 ± 0.34 4.96 ± 0.32 5.33 ± 0.41
Virgin vs MP, P valuea .0005 > .9999 .2667
Virgin vs LP, P valuea < .0001 .0198 .0014 .9729
MP vs LP, P valuea .1704 .0846 .5891
LP vs 4 wks PP, P valuea .9367 .0246 .0449
LP vs 12 wks PP, P valuea .6706 .0196 .6559 .0510
Virgin vs 4 wks PP, P valuea < .0001 > .9999 .9724
Virgin vs 12 wks PP, P valuea < .0001 > .9999 .2219 .0736

Data presented as mean +/− SEM of micrograms of collagen per milligram of tissue.

ECM, extracellular matrix; LP, late-pregnant; MP, mid-pregnant; PP, postpartum.

a

P values derived from two-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey’s pairwise comparisons with significance level set to 5%.

Alperin. Pregnancy adaptations in rat pelvic muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015.