Table 2.

Results of 40 to 60% training-testing experiments with different combinations of atlas cases.

#	PFV expert (${\mathrm{cm}}^3$)	PFV algorithm (${\mathrm{cm}}^3$)	$p$ value	Correlation ($R$)	Dice coefficient
1	$50.24\pm 25.17$	$52.78\pm 18.28$	0.59	0.91, $p<0.01$	$0.80\pm 0.05$
2	$55.28\pm 25.88$	$66.02\pm 38.55$	0.21	0.91, $p<0.01$	$0.79\pm 0.07$
3	$53.52\pm 22.42$	$57.31\pm 32.09$	0.52	0.94, $p<0.01$	$0.79\pm 0.06$
4	$56.83\pm 25.04$	$55.69\pm 24.60$	0.86	0.82, $p<0.01$	$0.80\pm 0.08$
5	$56.72\pm 25.06$	$61.07\pm 28.03$	0.37	0.92, $p<0.01$	$0.79\pm 0.08$
6	$56.79\pm 24.98$	$60.60\pm 26.87$	0.50	0.87, $p<0.01$	$0.81\pm 0.06$
7	$68.54\pm 25.64$	$70.96\pm 32.36$	0.70	0.89, $p<0.01$	$0.80\pm 0.09$