Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 3;18(2):e29. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4708

Table 5.

Effects of the intervention on binge drinking, excessive drinking and weekly consumption in the complete model.

Variablea Binge drinking Excessive drinking Weekly consumption

OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P β (SE) P
Condition (control) 0.40 (0.18-0.83) .01 0.48 (0.18-1.25) .13 1.82 (1.39) .19
Gender (male) 1.11 (0.93-1.33) .24 3.69 (2.74-4.97) <.001 –2.64 (0.36) <.001
Parental participation (yes) 0.60 (0.37-0.97) .04 0.78 (0.30-2.04) .61 0.83 (0.95) .38
Educational level (high) 0.54 (0.38-0.76) <.001 0.57 (0.37-0.89) .01 2.14 (0.71) .002
Age 0.74 (0.68-0.82) <.001 0.70 (0.62-0.78) <.001 1.30 (0.18) <.001
Religion (no religion)






Catholic 0.99 (0.80-1.23) .91 0.92 (0.69-1.23) .58 –0.03 (0.44) .95

Protestant 1.56 (1.08-2.25) .02 1.95 (1.05-3.64) .04 –1.06 (0.73) .15

Muslim 6.59 (4.00-10.88) <.001 1.94 (0.93-4.05) .08 –1.26 (0.86) .14

Other 1.57 (1.05-2.36) .03 1.82 (0.95-3.48) .07 –0.88 (0.81) .28
Ethnicity (Dutch) 1.22 (0.88-1.71) .25 1.50 (0.90-2.50) .10 –0.47 (0.65) .47
Interaction effects






Condition × gender 1.12 (0.77-1.62) .55 0.60 (0.31-1.13) .11 –1.00 (0.74) .17

Condition × educational level 1.13 (0.54-2.34) .75 2.15 (0.91-5.10) .08 –1.96 (1.49) .19

Condition × age 1.19 (0.98-1.43) .08 1.17 (0.92-1.48) .21 –0.32 (0.37) .39

Age 15 (control) 0.47 (0.24-0.91) .03




Age 16 (control) 0.56 (0.30-1.05) .07




Age 17 (control) 0.66 (0.34-1.28) .22




Age 18 (control) 0.79 (0.38-1.63) .52




Age 19 (control) 0.93 (0.40-2.17) .87




High educational level

1.48 (0.38-5.74) .57


Low educational level

0.46 (0.14-1.49) .19

a Reference category of categorical variables is indicated within parentheses.