Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 4;2016:8732521. doi: 10.1155/2016/8732521

Table 3.

Cox regression analysis of the prognostic factors of the patient survival period.

Variables Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR 95% CI p HR 95% CI p
Age
(≤65 years versus >65 years)
0.83 0.45–1.53 0.551
Sex
(male versus female)
1.17 0.64–2.12 0.615
Previous resection
(no versus yes)
0.73 0.37–1.43 0.358
UICC at first therapy
(stage I versus stages II–IV)
1.20 0.96–1.50 0.133
Lobar spread of disease
(unilobar versus bilobar)
1.47 0.78–2.76 0.237
Extrahepatic metastasis
(no versus yes)
1.55 0.78–3.09 0.211
Tumor load
(≤10% versus >10%)
1.81 0.99–3.31 0.055
Number of lesions
(1 versus >1)
2.44 1.27–4.71 0.008 2.85 1.43–5.65 0.003
Portal vein thrombosis
(no versus yes)
1.43 0.62–3.30 0.407
Vascular infiltration
(no versus yes)
1.20 0.65–2.24 0.560
Ascites
(no versus yes)
1.49 0.66–3.35 0.314
Liver cirrhosis
(no versus yes)
1.25 0.67–2.34 0.493
Biliary obstruction
(no versus yes)
1.02 0.53–1.97 0.950
ECOG index
(0 versus 1–4)
1.23 0.66–2.30 0.511
CA19–9
(≤39.9 U/mL versus >39.9 U/mL)
1.93 1.01–3.68 0.047 2.05 0.99 – 4.22 0.052
CEA
(≤3.4 ng/mL versus >3.4 ng/mL)
2.30 1.23–4.31 0.009 1.89 0.97 – 3.72 0.025
Objective response
(CR + PR versus SD + PD)
2.43 1.28–4.60 0.006 2.84 1.41 – 5.72 0.003
Complications
(no versus yes)
1.06 0.68–1.67 0.796
Tumor size
(≤50 mm versus >50 mm)
1.35 0.74–2.46 0.328
Tumor size
(≤100 mm versus >100 mm)
1.22 0.60–2.50 0.585

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; objective response categories, see Table 2.