Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2014 Jun 4;25(2):138–144. doi: 10.1038/jes.2014.40

Table 2.

Logistic regression health model with chronic exposure to air pollution, fit using the true exposure, and fit using the predicted exposures from several different kriging and land use regression models.

Exposure Scenario κ m Predicted exposure R2 Odds Ratio Empirical S.E. Model S.E. Mean Square Error 95% CI coverage
Chronic, True exposure 2.028 0.167 0.165 0.028 95.2

A1. Chronic, Kriging 0.5 100 0.27 2.570 0.769 0.513 0.654 89.3
A1. Chronic, Kriging 2 100 0.26 2.513 0.699 1.199 0.540 90.4

A1. Chronic, Kriging 0.5 500 0.44 2.170 0.293 0.284 0.092 94.8
A1. Chronic, Kriging 2 500 0.41 2.119 0.298 0.289 0.092 94.9

A2. Chronic, Kriging 0.5 100 0.25 1.815 0.397 0.314 0.167 83.1
A2. Chronic, Kriging 2 100 0.24 1.806 0.417 0.321 0.184 83.7

A2. Chronic, Kriging 0.5 500 0.36 1.657 0.232 0.204 0.089 75.4
A2. Chronic, Kriging 2 500 0.34 1.611 0.252 0.207 0.110 72.9

B1. Chronic, LUR 0.5 100 0.72 2.111 0.270 0.228 0.076 91.0
B1. Chronic, LUR 2 100 0.71 2.087 0.264 0.226 0.071 91.3

B1. Chronic, LUR 0.5 500 0.84 2.076 0.215 0.196 0.047 93.8
B1. Chronic, LUR 2 500 0.84 2.072 0.216 0.196 0.048 93.7