Table 1.
Partitioning | No. of Partitions | Parameters (k) | ln(L) | AIC | ΔAIC | 2 × ln ΔBF | RBF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
None | 1 | 9 | −1,279,328.877 | 2,558,675.754 | 105,496.41 | 21.76 | 0.059 |
Forward/Reverse | 2 | 18 | −1,258,902.112 | 2,517,840.225 | 64,660.88 | 20.79 | 0.058 |
Homogeneous/Heterogeneous | 2 | 18 | −1,273,139.835 | 2,546,315.669 | 93,136.33 | 21.51 | 0.060 |
Gene | 14 | 126 | −1,256,482.92 | 2,513,217.84 | 60,038.51 | 20.64 | 0.082 |
Codon 1 + 2 + 3 | 3 | 27 | −1,251,864.871 | 2,503,783.742 | 50,604.41 | 20.30 | 0.058 |
Codon 1 + 2 + 3 + Forward/Reverse | 6 | 54 | −1,229,360.303 | 2,458,828.606 | 5,649.26 | 16.11 | 0.050 |
Gene × codon | 42 | 378 | −1,226,211.669 | 2,453,179.339 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Note.—The likelihood of the data under each partitioning scheme was assessed on the fixed topology of a randomized parsimony tree under a GTR + G model, with the number of partitions, free parameters, and ln(L) scores used in the calculations given. ΔAIC refers to the decrease in likelihood relative to the most complex model (partitioning by gene and codon). Values for 2 × ln ΔBF10 > 10 are usually considered to be highly significant. RBF was calculated according to Castoe et al. (2005) as 2 × ln ΔBF10/Δ parameters, to penalize greater model complexity.