Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 8;8(1):161–175. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv241

Table 1.

Likelihood and AIC Values under Various Partitioning Schemes

Partitioning No. of Partitions Parameters (k) ln(L) AIC ΔAIC 2 × ln ΔBF RBF
None 1 9 −1,279,328.877 2,558,675.754 105,496.41 21.76 0.059
Forward/Reverse 2 18 −1,258,902.112 2,517,840.225 64,660.88 20.79 0.058
Homogeneous/Heterogeneous 2 18 −1,273,139.835 2,546,315.669 93,136.33 21.51 0.060
Gene 14 126 −1,256,482.92 2,513,217.84 60,038.51 20.64 0.082
Codon 1 + 2 + 3 3 27 −1,251,864.871 2,503,783.742 50,604.41 20.30 0.058
Codon 1 + 2 + 3 + Forward/Reverse 6 54 −1,229,360.303 2,458,828.606 5,649.26 16.11 0.050
Gene × codon 42 378 −1,226,211.669 2,453,179.339 n/a n/a n/a

Note.—The likelihood of the data under each partitioning scheme was assessed on the fixed topology of a randomized parsimony tree under a GTR + G model, with the number of partitions, free parameters, and ln(L) scores used in the calculations given. ΔAIC refers to the decrease in likelihood relative to the most complex model (partitioning by gene and codon). Values for 2 × ln ΔBF10 > 10 are usually considered to be highly significant. RBF was calculated according to Castoe et al. (2005) as 2 × ln ΔBF10/Δ parameters, to penalize greater model complexity.