Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Feb 18.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Genet. 2014 Jun 6;87(3):225–232. doi: 10.1111/cge.12419

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics for disease perception scales

Scale/variable Clinical interpretation
Perceived seriousnessa Sample mean in low average range (z = −0.76)16
 Mean, SD 19.1 ± 10.9 Higher levels equal greater level of perceived seriousness
 Range 0–48
Perceived control-lifestyleb Sample mean above neutral (some confidence)
 Mean, SD 4.7 ± 1.7 Higher levels equal greater perceived control via lifestyle changes
 Range 1–7
Perceived control-medicalc Sample mean above neutral (some confidence)
 Mean, SD 4.2 ± 1.6 Higher levels equal greater perceived control via seeking medical attention
 Range 1–7
a

Participant agreement on a 5-point scale on the 12 item Health Belief Model Seriousness Subscale.

b

Participant confidence rating on a 7-point Likert scale for the following statement: ‘This condition is ‘actionable’ in the sense that changes in my lifestyle, diet, exercise routine, etc. could decrease my degree of risk and/or improve my health outcome’.

c

Participant confidence rating on a 7-point Likert scale for the following statement: ‘This condition is ‘actionable’ in the sense that seeing a physician more frequently, having more frequent medical check-ups, tests, etc. could decrease my degree of risk and/or improve my health outcome’.